Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> Meeting of May if 1988 <br /> Page 2. <br /> ruling as far as having a nonvegetative approach to the protection of <br /> the slope and he is banking this whole thing on that, hie" would life <br /> to retain and other abutters have demonstrated a desire to do the same <br /> thing. It is within the owner' s rights to reinforce or strengthen. <br /> !s Behrman stated, do it on the 40 foot contour and not change the <br /> terrain between. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday asked if they had carried out the Order of Conditions , <br /> would they have evacuated that? Mr. Tavares stated yes, exactly, that <br /> is what was authorized. It would be necessary to build the wall and <br /> backfill , This is the way it is to be interpreted. <br /> Ms Behrman stated the Commission would disagree and mould be happy to <br /> elaborate. The entire area of 12 feet does not have to be excavated to <br /> build the trench. <br /> Mr. Tavares stated the wall has always been in Mr. Parson' s thoughts . <br /> Ms Behrman stated the abutters would be obligated to build the same <br /> thing. The Mate a abutters, on the Fisheries ramp , would nail their <br /> hides to the wall as an erosion situation would be created. <br /> Mrs. Jacobson stated she did not think the water level ill be as high <br /> a . in the past and does not see a need for the wall , <br /> Ms Behrman stated, to convince the -Commission this wall is absolutely <br /> necessary to control erosion, a report from a licensed, engineer utust <br /> be provided stating there will be no negative effects on the abutters. <br /> The gineer' s credentials should be provided also. <br /> TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. <br /> 7: 30 - Larry Butler (New Seabury Engineering-Agent) for a determin- <br /> ation of applicability on a proposal to construct two small wood- <br /> framed additions on c,oncrto foundations and 1 "XI ' brick patio at <br /> Unit 675 Maushop Village. Continued from April 14. Jack Brown and Jim <br /> Pavelick presenting. Plans were reviewed . It is planned to renovate <br /> an existing one bedroom cottage by building up a second story and two <br /> wood frame additions . The present cottage is sitting on concrete <br /> blocks and will be ,jacked up to excavate for a perimeter foundation <br /> and for concrete foundation under the building. The work l unit has <br /> been stared approximately 80 feet from the bluff and along the basin. <br /> Runoff from the roof will be directed to two drell . The structure <br /> is not presently guttered and it As planned to gutter the new with <br /> drywells. They are also looping to build a brick patio. <br /> The Chairman suggested they sit down with the Conservation Agent to <br /> Trite up the exact wording for the request. <br /> Mr . Brown stated only the nes 'structure is barely within. the 100 foot <br /> limit. The entire area, from the cottage to the bluff, is under an ex- <br /> istins Order of Conditions. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday suggested pulling in the haybales but it was agreed this <br />