9/8/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conslervation Commission September 988 Page Mr . Rosenberg stated where this is in an ACEC zone, the question is to the propriety of allowing a bulkhead; it will be answered by DEQE., Mr . Sanicki advised DEQE told him the bulkhead was not allowed and there was correspondence this was in a velocity. zone, he clarified.. this and a DEQE number was issued. This correspondence was reviewed and a copy- will be furnished to the Commission. Mrs. Jacobson stated, referring to the statement they .just grant-,.-.to maintain the shoreline (Mr.Sanicki , correct.) and this wal.l. rt--there before. . Mr.Sanic i : It-' - there. yes, 1 was.. out. there nd� At"s..eroding here and here as a result of this- wall. So,_ now if we double the walk, in size, we are going to erode some more, the only di-fference being that it will b on the abutter's- property '.,opp . e . to the-: g. This a i-sting all,, in� all p-rob flit , is what' s -causing the. erosion; you can see- how it"s taking place in both places.. r.._-Leach::r ,.i-.sareed Mr. S ni-cki stated- the erosion. is caused.-h --. ack .*.f vegetat- n r a Meted by tidal action. Mr. Coffey asked the age of the existing wall .. Mr. Leach stated-.he- put it in himself approximately 25 years ago. CONTINUED, TO OCTOBER 6. 1988 AT 7:30 P,M. - Mary M. Hoar , 30 Waterline Drive North , Braman Engineering, Continued from August 25, 1988. Atty. Dick Dubin and. Doug..-Cameron presenting. To mend an existing Order of Conditions. Abu.t,ter -receipts were presented . The house was built in 1980 and an Order of Conditions were issued just for the pier; at the time, he understood you did not have to get the float permitted. The Order of Conditions did not in- clude a float. The original is shown by the dotted. lime and., i - all- that was authorized. The Hoars. purchased, the house in 1980. He- owned 3 " boat and, in 1981 or 1982 he had the float put in. Mir. Hoag died last year and Mfrs. Hoar is attempting to sell the. house. The, float. is. put in every year. There is no Certificate of Compliance. Mr. Rosenberg asked if the dock was in at the time the Hoars bought the house wi thout a- Cert i f i Bate of Comp Ii anc . Mr. Dubin- aid- no.,,. it was being constructed and it went in some time after. Certificates were few arra far between in the early ' 80's. r; Rosenberg- asked if the Order was recorded and was told it was. Mfrs. Jacobson asked if the dock was put in in a different location than 'shown on the plan. Mr. Dubin stated a different length. ant.- differ ent location. There is no float now and this- gets us to- late 1987 when Mr. Hoar was still alive, New Seabury Corp. procurred a buyer. The-. house went under agreement in the fall of * 8 . In the Spring a ' , the prospective buyer investigated the dock to, make sure all approvals were there and discovered the float was not authorized* He came to the Commission and the float has been removed. The parties have a. hold- back type arrangement and they. are looking to see If the Order can be e nded to the way the dock actually is. It is compatible with the rest of the neighborhood ; it is out of the way in- a cave* The Commission agreed the location of the float is an improvement.