Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> September 8 , 1988 <br /> Page 8. <br /> more specifically. <br /> DT : Motion made and seconded to deny the request for extension at <br /> this time and that they come in when ready to move forward with <br /> a new set of plans. <br /> REQUEST DENIED - LETTER TO BE WRITTEN. <br /> NX <br /> Mary Hoar - Dick Dubin returned and stated they recognize the need to <br /> compromise and would like to ask for 12 X 20 allowing existing p lleS <br /> to stay. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated an 8 X 20 would allow the piles t-o stay. Mr. <br /> Dubin stated his boat can' t go on 8 X 20. The only zitigating factor <br /> is that he tried to do it the right way4 <br /> Mr. Rosenbe'rS stated we have had a whole series of applications to <br /> modify docks which people who origin ally cage in for a dock for <br /> dinghy and are now in with a 40' boat. <br /> Mr. Dubin advised the boat is in the aid-30 ' s and he would prefer to <br /> stay with the 1 ' and shorten the width. There is a pretty good pre- <br /> cedent for allowing the 12 X 16 ; it sounds like the 20 is not an <br /> acceptable fi ure. Mould the Board consider 12 X 18; every inch is <br /> critical to his. The only good thing is at least he did it the right <br /> way and it has been there. for 6 or 7 years. He might have been the <br /> type to be tempted not to do the right. thing. <br /> Mrs. Jacobson stated, but then he would not get a Certificate of Comp- <br /> liance and make the purchase . She stated she did not understand why <br /> the 12 X 18 . Mr. Dubin stated most }people prefer 12 because it is more <br /> stable. <br /> Mr. Burns stated he has a ' gide and has no problem docking on it. <br /> Mr. Dubin Mated his client is firmly convinced he would rather go <br /> with the 1 , even if 12 x 16. <br /> Mrs. ,Jacobson stated she would go along with a 12 X 16. <br /> Mr. Cameron stated by doing that he is going to have to pull the <br /> piles. You have a 12 X 28 float there now, to go down to a 12 X 20 <br /> would allow the float to rest on these piles . Mrs* Jacobson Mated so <br /> would an 8 X 2010 <br /> Mr . Coffey pointed out that we have some 336 sq. ft. we never said was <br /> okay and what we' re pushing for is a 0- 0 compromise. <br /> 1r. Dubin stated there is no real good argument to make when someone <br /> wants the biggest dock in the bay. He asked if 12 X 16 would be all <br /> right' <br /> Cass Costa asked, 12 X 16 or an option for an Mr. Rosenberg <br /> stated we have to d one w the other . , Dubin ed the <br /> o �t y o stat <br /> client would prefer 12 X 16 rather than 8 X 2 . Ms Costa asked if he <br /> was sure. <br /> Mr . Rosenberg stated it does not make sense because if he has a ' <br />