Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> November 10, 1988 <br /> Page 14. <br /> Mr. Shulze advised they plan to use cinderblocks with a cobbl s on <br /> facing tied , with rods through the ciinderbodls.- <br /> Ms gehrman stated an Order of Conditions uiduld kave o- be issued on <br /> the wall , with a Notfee of,' Intent <br /> Mrs. Jacobson asked. If Mr,. *S'ehulze was stating .he- would el i ina;te ' the <br /> a{al l and ju.s grade i t down r.� hulze strated #pis drip in ' a -er. is <br /> coning out of, there and h-e is concernewith all t�d . A e. <br /> creosote coming <br /> out _ o�f the .. l ,, .}. Mrs,.' '�Jacobso' st ated�� .thea' have"' been ins 1 n` ,that <br /> is not- problem, Mr. Sc� ulze stated 5one of then aii- s9tiI I leaking. <br /> His other concern is the l of e. Mr' s- . Jacobs'on stated, SAven 'the wat6r <br /> l ural , 'there will no wind `driven water <br /> Mr, .Sch 1 z stated the poles woul-d be pulled out with a bobcat.` .. , <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if he would bewilling not td 'do a.hy of the seawall <br /> work? Mr. Schulze asked,' you mea re-subm-it for therest of the work? <br /> Ys; he has to get ometh in-g` done.- nd aai eed to'' f i`l a a' blot i ce of- <br /> Intent <br /> f.-Intent for the wall . <br /> Lisa pointed out he will have to sign the plan at being done by,'-him <br /> and Prot' refer to the engineer' s stamp. <br /> Mrs. Simmont stated the Commission- -ill rule on the suer om, patio and' <br /> -decd . Would that; be a reeab 1 e <br /> Mrs. Behrman asked for a written statement of how many, -weep holes will <br /> be -put in. Mr. . Schu I ze stated he feels every other 'biock_: WoU1,d be <br /> fared up with a screen, Ms Eehrman stated that hold b -put' on' the <br /> application . <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if Mr . Schulze understood the di tinction _ dr an <br /> r <br /> bet' een loo in t the way he, proposes to' do the rest tyre word . aid <br /> what the rest of the work is'; It doesn' t have' 'an. imrp ct 9 ori what the i <br /> xeonmis ion -is tryinS to prote,ct, but the wall atx the water is. <br /> Mr. - Schulze staters he understood that and that W his biggest <br /> concern. <br /> VCT .= Motion made and seconded . to issue a negative -determln9ation with <br /> th'e receipt of a reprised PDA el,imina ing the retaining wall at <br /> the water. <br /> EAP I MC TO BE CLOSED UPM RECE I PT OF- A -REV I SED RDA W 1 TM THE ,ASS MPT I ON <br /> IT WILL BE A NEGATIVE DETERICI NATI M WITH THE ELIMINATION OF THE <br /> RETAINING WALL AT THE WATER.' <br /> .8: 45 - Am-brose Janed (Arrow Ern ineering Lot -49- Captain' s Row. George <br /> Thorn presenting 'wi tin Mr. a�nedr. The same footprint willbe used <br /> they ars buildin ,, -not out. Abutters receipts were presented. The <br /> deck is 1 ' .X 10 ' ; the balcony i 8' X 8' .- The are als6 -proposing to <br /> u rade ' the existing se tic' system; there will - a leachins trend. <br /> roval was received fr~o'm the Board o H alt.h.. Theyasked that a- <br /> pp _ <br /> reserve- stir be installed 'also. They are ire the -1 ' buffer z o <br /> t her MashpeeRiver. Ha bales will be insta .1 d- at the high atex� mark. - <br /> I t was 'Agreed to br i n8 the ha rb l ' I i ne back ins i de f the stone wa . 1 , <br /> other - than for the well . <br />