My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/10/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
11/10/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:03:58 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 12:43:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/10/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> November 10, 1-988 <br /> Page 8. <br /> Coffey speaking, continued: houses.' <br /> Lindholm: Under the house, we3d be 'Interested, in making sure there <br /> were proper drainage under - foundation systems and that there- would be <br /> structural fill that would keep the house from tettlins <br /> differentially, so sand-and -crushed stone , those finds of things would <br /> be utilized immediately around the house and the drainage area, those <br /> sane kinds of materials would be favorable but for different reasons <br /> because we would be looking for permeability and this being a ,beaching <br /> facility, a would be all owing for pereo,lation out in the back. On the <br /> slope, you would be looking for a stuctur- 1 material Iii-e th-e sand <br /> again, there' s going to' be a godA material for. t at and there' s going <br /> to be a one on three slope. As the Commission is worried, you' re going <br /> to stabilize the top surface for runoff. -These are the kind of-issues <br /> we are tryingto get r ■ r r a r <br /> Coffey: And the purpose of that particular area's <br /> Lindholm: The purpose of the slope With the house,- it' s a grading <br /> problem' and if it' s preferred that the house is n- an acceptable grade, <br /> in line with the roadway for accessibility to the house, then we' ve <br /> got the wetland area in back of the house, so it' s how to get from <br /> point A to point B. <br /> Coffey: - Would it be a severe onfli '- to have a walkout basement _ <br /> situation as opposed to filling that area. . . . . . . . compensatory storage. <br /> Lindholm: Risht noir, I ' m not aware that we' re in to a compensatory - <br /> storage. 1 don' t know that we are, that' s not the way this is filed. <br /> Simmons: But this is a Auestion that' s going - to have- to be ad re'sse , <br /> is there an area's <br /> Lindholm-: This filing says no, there isn' t. <br /> Simmons: But you haven' t sho rn that sufficiently to the Commission,. ' <br /> Behrman: You' re re o i n to establish 58 foot' grades, is that correct? <br /> You have an 8 ft. drop in 25 feet, which is not, all that bad, why do <br /> you meed the rest of this? <br /> Lindholm: That ' s the way it' s f i d e <br /> ehrnan: ,east don' t see the point to the r t:.. o it because it"s. riot <br /> a -ma 'or unstable drop from here t-o here'. Why bother with al I -'th i <br /> nonsense] <br /> Lindhol = 1 Odn' t design thi . 1"m sure the professionals involved in <br /> this pair i ular design had reasons for doing, it. <br /> _ Behr an: I ' d like to know the reason iks there is a lot of <br /> ,en iron cental disruption that could be avoided. <br /> Saylog: He wasn ' t involved and remember talking to the previous <br /> gentleman in his position and what they were trying to do is to have <br /> flat space for the back yard. To be honest with you, I did not <br /> recommend that; I would have recommended to sing this around and <br /> leave this area. Lindholm: you' re chicken) No; that is m <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.