Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> January 5. 1989 <br /> Page <br /> Hs Behrman suggested, for the applicant' s own benefit, that the <br /> Commission get some find of record on exactly what the house is and <br /> some kind of as-built permit filed on the house itself because of that <br /> enlargement. � It is there and could be a potential cloud on the title, <br /> In addition to the topography, she requested distances from the house <br /> to the water and retaining wall to the edge of the water* Mr. Hayes <br /> agreed. -He will dig into the coastal bank issue also. <br /> Mrs. Simmons suggested drywel is be put in for .thee guttering. She <br /> referred to a gutter on the peak of the roof without a downspout. <br /> These should be located on the plan, with details. <br /> Mr. Hayes stated he will show the proposed path on the as-built and <br /> asked if the Commission wanted it staked. It was agreed this was <br /> necessary* <br /> Ms Behrman stated on the remised plan it should be noted the lawn to <br /> be removed arra shrub barrier to be expanded; proposed shrubs and for <br /> what area wood chips to be removed. Hr. Hayes stated the mood chips <br /> would not be removed as they are a stabilization factor. Ms Behrman <br /> stated. she wanted to - see the gravel on the plan and is wary of having <br /> wood chips on the edge of the water as a high, tide would wash them <br /> away. Mr. Hayes agreed they could be removed. <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated the outdoor shower will have to be checked with <br /> the Board of Health to. see if it has had a permit. fir. Hayes stated <br /> that is not a Commission charge. Mrs... Sinmons stated it is in <br /> resource area and is not on the plan. <br /> Mr. Hayes suggested the resource areas and the issues of the <br /> enforcement issue be addressed and then he will come in and the issues <br /> identified as having to be permitted. He would prefer to address the <br /> outstanding issues in the letter form, not only in the interest of <br /> brevity but in cost to r . .Herman <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated the Notice can be amended. <br /> Lisa stated they are showing an as-built as khat is on the property <br /> and not showing the shower. <br /> Hr. Hayes stated Dr . Herman is desperately trying, through ECSC, to do <br /> what he has to do to satisfy the enironmerr-tal concerns and also to <br /> make sure the interests of the Board are taken care of. They will look <br /> at the drrwells, outdoor shower, the wood chips along the pond, the <br /> topography and show the sod to be removed and where plantings will be; <br /> where gravel and existing landscaping is. He will come up with an <br /> overlay. He asked if the Commission has a problem with allowing the <br /> gravel to stay . <br /> Ms Behan an stated she would like to take a look at it with the plan in <br /> hand of what is proposed. <br /> Mr. Caffey asked if it were possible to plow the lawn back in without <br /> removing it r. Hayes stated no, it can be planted into indigenous <br /> shrubs which will not allow grass to grow under, mulch it and allow <br /> the mulch to stay on site and .decompose protected by haybls at the <br /> bank . Mr . Coffey did not see the point of conditioning 'by hand' if <br /> there was going to be that much disturbances <br />