Laserfiche WebLink
onsery at i _n Commission <br /> May - 1 , 1989 <br /> Rage 110 <br /> Ms Behrman asked how vegetation is to grow under the cantilevered deck <br /> and was told it will be about 4-5 fit. elevation. She stated 2 inch <br /> gaps between the boards are inadequate to support ve etation. She also <br /> noted the proposed fence around the edge of the deck is not shown. <br /> Mrs. Jacobson asked if at the patio level it will be attached to ars <br /> -exsting deck. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg requested a proper plan showing all of these items and <br /> elevations. Based on this plan- it seems haybales are 2 feet from the <br /> deck. <br /> Ms Behrman asked where the original limit of work was and was told the <br /> haybales are still there. She asked that he reverify the edge of the <br /> wetland and position of the staking and delineate equipment access on <br /> the plan. . <br /> -Mrw. Rosenberg asked what would be done with the excavated material . <br /> ,Mr. Palmatier stated it will be :regraded to conform to existing <br /> . contours; excess to be trucked from the site, approxiately 35 yards. <br /> CONTINUED TO JUNE 29 - 7:300 .- <br /> G. <br /> :3 . <br /> GERARD DR GK R. For a Determination o . p l cab i I i ty on a prop sa 1 <br /> to replace a lower and upper deck at 202 Waterway. There was no one <br /> - present for the hearing. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he saw no problem with the project. It is 30 feet <br /> to the edge of the water from the limit of .work. ,- <br /> GT * Motion made and seconded to issue a Negative Determination. <br /> NEGATIVE ET RMI NAT I CSN. <br /> ROBERT JOHNSON - Certificate of Compliance issued. <br /> VINCENT PORCIELLO JR. : Mr. Sherman stated he was Pore concerned about <br /> the bark next to. the pool than the fence. It is sandy and only covered <br /> with straw; a rainstorm could be a problem. <br /> Mr . Rosenberg stated Mr. Porciello should be told the Coomission -wants <br /> a complete revegetation before they come in to ask for anything. If <br /> not done, there may be further Orders from the Commission. <br /> COMPUTER: Mr. Coffey presented a preliminary assessment of meed. The <br /> projected cost is $29300 - $39300, , <br /> DOTE.: Motion made and seconded to approve that Louise Behrman, Patrick <br /> Coffey and Gertrude Simmons continue on the project. <br /> Lew Schwartz has inquired about Commission action on his letter con-' <br /> cerning New Seabury's proposed sale of lots declared wetlands by the <br /> Dept. of Natural Resources. A letter to be sent requesting any other <br /> information he can provide. <br />