My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/27/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:09:16 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 1:50:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
July 27v 19 — Pate 9. <br /> COOK: That was an abandoned cranberry bog because I used to <br /> pick there and now it's all crown up but that sure is a very <br /> wet place. <br /> MR. P LAN: I live on Fells Pond Road. I would .dike to <br /> understand flow I abut and how I would be affected and if the <br /> pond would be affected in some way. <br /> R NBER : This is all on the other side of Great Neck Road. <br /> KAPLAN: Is there some diSCUSSion about creating some new <br /> roads: <br /> SIMMONS: We have no idea. <br /> GRAY: At this, poInt, the only purpose of the filing by New <br /> eabur.y before the corrmission is simply to .identify the <br /> boundaries of all the resource areas; the resource area <br /> being the wetland resources, , inland and coastal, so that then <br /> New Seabury, once theCommission has issued their <br /> determination on those boundaries,, then the New Seabury <br /> Corp. , through their engineers and consultants can then go to <br /> a design mode in which they will design whatever they ars <br /> doing to design out there and at that point there Will <br /> probably be a plan showing roads and other features that all <br /> of the people in the area might definitely want to be taking <br /> a hard :gook K t. <br /> APLAN: I 'm hearing you say that right now folks on Peals <br /> Pond should not be concerned or express concern to the <br /> E:orru fission, at this point any way, over this issue. <br /> RO e are just attempting to d Uermine the extent of <br /> the statutory jurisdiction of the Commission. Our <br /> jur i.sdict;ion relates to water and wetland areas,, marshes and <br /> areas of that sort, very broadly defined and areas <br /> surrounding, usually 100 ft. surrounding those ":land <br /> areas#4 and there is a broad series of definitions o <br /> wetlands. In order to determine which areas within this <br /> large plan we have any jurisdiction for regulation, we have <br /> o determine min which are the wetland areas. Then we can <br /> determine the boundaries of our jurisdiction. That is the <br /> purpose of the present meeting. Once the limits of the <br /> jurisdiction of the Commission has been established.fished .gin one of <br /> the several ways that the law permits, thea both the <br /> Cuff ission and New Seabury Corp. know with respect to which <br /> areas of the proposed development they have to cone to us <br /> with so—called Notices of Intent to give. us the rights <br /> conferred to this Commission under two separate sets of law <br /> and regulations. One is the state law, Chapter 131, Section <br /> 40 and the r'egUlatioris pro poundf-d by the ,tate under that <br /> 5t__citUt13. Secondly, there it, a completely separate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.