My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/10/2005 BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE Minutes
>
11/10/2005 BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2022 4:12:08 PM
Creation date
2/22/2018 12:46:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> Mr. Santos did not have an answer to the question posed by the Chairman. <br /> Lee gurney spoke and said that her guess would he that usually the only way <br /> someone could find out if the property was Title 5 was when someone sold his or her <br /> house. She added that there were cottages in her neighborhood that were old and she <br /> would guess that they would need Title 5. She guessed that a lot of people who were <br /> seasonal to her neighborhood did not pump their cesspools. <br /> The Chairman said that the reason for his question was that one of the things he <br /> was considering was satellite sewer systems, <br /> Ms. Gurney stated that the more permanent residents would be the hest place to <br /> start. <br /> Mr. Santos added that in New Seabury, people were taking down cottages and <br /> making thein into `trophy houses," and that the agreement made was that we wanted <br /> them tied to the sewer. One of the things that was in agreement was when the line was <br /> done the street, they had to tie in to the sewer system. <br /> The Chairman asked if in the future even existing Title 5's would have to tie in to <br /> the sewer system <br /> Mr. Santos added that he thought that at this point, it would kind of be premature. <br /> He said that if in five years they were having a.meeting, the Town would have just gotten <br /> the money,that within five gears, pipes were going to he laid, then we might want to take <br /> a step back, you could do a temporary repair or just do a Title 5, under the stipulation, as <br /> soon as the line cones down the street, the homeowner would have to be tied in. <br /> The Chainnan asked rhetorically that if homeowners tied into the system, down <br /> the roads would you envision tying in for all existing Title s? As soon as that line cones <br /> down the street? <br /> The Chairman said that if you move in that direction} you will have a ready, set <br /> direction, you are going to lay pipe in areas where they come in.. <br /> Ms. Gurney said that an escrow option could be considercd. <br /> Ms. Kane said that the discussion was premature. <br /> Discussion of watersheds Map <br /> F. Thomas Fudala <br /> F. Thomas Fudala spoke into the microphone behind the lectern and explained to <br /> the Corer ttee a facilities play he had created, regarding both waquoit and 11 ashpee <br /> ubwatersheds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.