My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/23/2006 BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE Minutes
>
2/23/2006 BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2018 5:12:11 PM
Creation date
2/22/2018 12:59:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/23/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
said the Commission used the wetland's Protection Act to try to achieve some of these benefits for the <br /> Town. <br /> He added that he thought some of the regulations the Commission would be very good models for <br /> the'town. Part of the frustration for the Commission was that heir jurisdiction was very limited. Basically* <br /> it}s a hundred feet from the edge of any identified resource area, a pend, wetland,200 feet for rivers,he <br /> said. The other thing frustrating for the Commission is that a let of properties were grand fathered, and <br /> other things that the Commission could net do much about. <br /> He believes that one of the reasons why,the Conservation Commission,and he spore for himself", <br /> unanimously support the Planning Board's DCPC process. He said that as a committee,he was going to <br /> make some actions that night that the Town could take that it may be necessary to revisit the IU PC <br /> process. It may take the resources and capabilities of that process to achieve some of these things,He <br /> hoped that would be considered throughout the DCPC process. He said that he knew the Commission <br /> would give a lot of support to the Board throughout the process. <br /> 1n that regard,he said,the Commission probably knew more than anyone else in Town about the <br /> quality of hath the ground water and surface waters in lashpee,whether it was the main estuaries and bays <br /> of waquoit and Popponesset,the various streams and ponds and wetlands and ground water.The <br /> Commission has a very strong understanding of it. The Commission saw a couple years ago,the first <br /> serious algal btoom its waquoit Bay. A once important shellfish area now destroyed for shell fxshifl <br /> Part of the Commission}s frustration was that they had an understanding of it,but so little power <br /> to do much about it,very limited. He said he hoped the Commission could help by sharing some of the <br /> things that we worked on,he was going back to rewrite the lawn regulation,to make it even more stringent. <br /> His jurisdiction was very limited in that regard. <br /> On the other side, in his professional field,his hole in education devetoping programs and models <br /> and concepts for ecological landscaping and land use,there were some things he could help with in that <br /> regard. You probably aware that waquoit Bay is probably one of the most studied estuane system in the <br /> United States and some of it's more recent studies have been significant attempts to pinpoint the sources of <br /> nutrient pollution in waquoit Bay, <br /> Mr.Talbot added that its the current political envirotiment,there would be nothing done to power <br /> plants,in fact it may make it worse. <br /> What comes next is wastewater treatment,which he described as a critical element.He said that if <br /> you took at what remains in that,when they have some sort of sewage treatment system* is storm run-off <br /> and landscape fertilizers and more exclusively lawn fertilizers. That could be 15 to 23%.that's big and <br /> something the Committee and.Commission could do something about.we see the effects more on the Cape <br /> than other places. Looking at more effective means of storm water management particularly of direct run- <br /> off.He noticed in a number of places where storm drains lead out through the outfall pipe that goes too <br /> often than not that feeds directly to a waterway that feeds directly to wa quoit or Popponesset. Anything <br /> from cars, salt, sand can move over asphalt,which provides almost no impedance of storm water run-off. <br /> Putting on his professional hat,he spoke about low impact development what they involve is the <br /> effort to be sure that all storm water run-offs are infiltrated by biological systems right within the <br /> development.It costs a lot of money to create.Planted areas that are intended to capture and utilize storm <br /> water and to provide a biological filter for the pollutants and the nutrients that may be involved in that <br /> storm water.He said he would love to see the town doing it. It was being done elsewhere,he would love to <br /> see an assessment of where the storm water drains are going now and to make a concerted effort to begin to <br /> convert those away from outfall pipes to systems like rain guards and bioretention filters.He thought it was <br /> good to think about moving into that area.. <br /> He spore about buffer zones,creating buffers between storm water run-off and these sensitive <br /> waterways and wetlands. <br /> He then spore about properties where lawns go dawn to the water line and were grand fathered, <br /> the Commission had no jurisdiction,these houses were built before the Town had its' by-law, Until,the <br /> owners come to the Commission that they need a permit for, and the group will say, "'well,now you"ve got <br /> to do something about this edge,you can't just leave it like this." <br /> The Commission has created a regulation where no more than 10%of the property in its' <br /> jurisdiction can be turned into can be converted into lawn. <br /> He said that the Commission's goal was to seek to protect of public and private water supplies <br /> alterations occurring in a.residential lot or subdivision in any area of jurisdiction should result in a <br /> nitrate/nitrogen load, not exceeding five parts per trillion. He said when the Commission calculated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.