Laserfiche WebLink
improve the hydraulic radius, the river moves a little faster, and it holds more organic particles M* <br /> suspension,rather than letting them settle out. <br /> Neiā€¢. biller said that what Mr. Baker infers that the Waterways Commission does not <br /> favor side casting. <br /> At the Waterways Commission meeting on Tuesday of that week in March, lir. Baker <br /> said,the discussion of the Mashpee liver showed drawings of marsh islands,that were a <br /> minimum of 20' feet away from tfre marsh. And the comments was that the drawings had to be <br /> updated a little bit_, then by run iing a flow analysis by the computer model, a couple of rens for <br /> $150,00 does a piece, is the way it was subscribed. <br /> He said that it looked as though the project was going in the wrong direction, he didn't <br /> warrt to characterize anybody or anything, and said that it looked to him that a little guidance <br /> would not hurt. <br /> Mr. Miller said he was neither looking to characterize anybody or anything, either. He <br /> said he,was not knowledgeable about where the Water Concession stands,the whole picture, but <br /> since the Committee's role was to make recommendations to the Board of Selectmen, he thought <br /> the Cottee agreed there was an urgency to this doing it in the most construetive and least <br /> destructive way. if e way that your advocating falls into that category,then maybe we could <br /> urge the Selectmen could confer with the Waterways Cornirnssion to see that it could be <br /> faellitated. He added that the key to what the Commission was doing was concerned with <br /> probably dredging for navigation, probably not so concerned about the environmental condition <br /> of stopping some of the nitrogen loading and bacterial loading, if you could kill two birds with <br /> one stone, then why don't you do it, he addcd <br /> Beverly Dane spoke and said that she reeled irr a prior Water-ways Commission meeting <br /> was that the effective way to get the project moving was to bring the soils to the transfer station to <br /> deposit therm. She also recalled that it was said that the better moray to do it was to side casting. She <br /> recalled that Mr, Batiks was at the meeting. She said she totally conferred with Mr, Banks <br /> regarding Mr. Langley and the way he responded to the group that was present at that meeting. <br /> She said she felt very positive they had.finally Bund a contact at the LBP who is expressing the <br /> D P's condition about being very receptive to proceeding projects in different towns and what <br /> they needed to do to solve these problems. She said she Felt very good about seeing a little light <br /> here and that the regulations probably want to be changed and she saw it as a turning point for the <br /> problems of the Mashpee River and hoped the Waterways Comnaission would come back before <br /> this Committee and explain the direcdon they are proposed to going. "t suggest a timeline," she <br /> said. She said that there was a dialog going on and hoped to continue with it. <br /> The Chairman said that he thought the waterways Commission and the DBP would <br /> figure out the best solution and should move forward. <br /> Other members of the Committee,including Lee Gurney coneurr'ed with the Chairman's <br /> statement. <br /> Douglas Storrs spoke and said it was a massive issue and that he didn"t think that it was <br /> the role of the Committee(Blue Ribbon)to be dealing with that par6cular level of specificity and <br /> said that he thought the waterways Commission had been a champion of it for gears. He said that <br /> the Blue Ribbon Committee looks to advise and takes that advice, and goes over the advice and <br /> makes directions for ail action plan to the Selectmen and the Planning Board,but we are not a <br /> eommittee who is involved in the specificity of the role that we are getting into, in the river, with <br /> all due respect to that issue. He stated that he hoped that the Committee had spent as much time <br /> on the river, at this specific point as on and use, on zoning, on nitrogen as a broader-issue and <br /> why the heck do the R P and the L P don't jibe to the zoning in much broader issues that affect <br /> the character of our community, how we got to where we are today and what we are going to be <br /> in the next twenty years. He said he wanted to spend more thne on other issues that were critical <br /> to l ashpee community and part of the Com"ttee's charge. <br />