Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> Public Hearing - 2/10/94 <br /> Wage 2. <br /> 95% of this is the sane as the State regs. Under normal maintenance, the Co n- <br /> ission has eliminated the section that said l maintain flow of existing natural <br /> waterway' . Under this version a filing would be required with a $2o fee which <br /> would. enable the Co�ssion to look at how it is done. Other than that, .all of <br /> normal maintenance is the same; the differences are underlined. He read from <br /> the reps. <br /> Page + L The only difference here is application of sand to existing bogs and <br /> excavation of sand pits, or new sand pits, the language was added 'within the <br /> buffer zone of Bordering Land subject to Flooding' . <br /> Page 5, dealing with the cutting of trees for owners use, it was reduced from <br /> 20,000 board feet and 50 cords, to 10,000 board feet and 20 cords, in response <br /> to advice Mr. Sherman has received from the field. Mere on Cape Cod, there are <br /> not large forests for people to cuf.. The state Regs will be reduced to those <br /> levels shortly. <br /> Normal maintenance does not cover work in waterways or great ponds as defined <br /> in 310 CMR 91 C hapt r 91 Reg . A rear filing would be required and a <br /> Conservation Plan would. be accepted. The fee would be $20.00. <br /> Normal .improvement of agriculture has been charged in the state version of the <br /> AG regs; conservation plan is produced to a Commission and. the Commission has <br /> no capacity to question it other than the delineation of the wetlands and that <br /> authority is 1 <br />