Laserfiche WebLink
hw Conservation Commssion. <br /> Public Hearing - February 1 , 1994 <br /> Page 6. <br /> certain things, she could do that. Mr. Sherman stated things listed under normal <br /> maintenance, yes. She continued, that would include water management and other <br /> things but then under Section B4, it seems to say for th:x3e same things, she could <br /> not do it beyond the square footage listed, even with a Conservation Plan. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated on page 4, A, B) C and D. the limits within the parenthesis, <br /> 5,000, 1 ,00, 10,000 and 5,000 are the same as in the state regs except that <br /> they call it BVW, <br /> Ms Fantozzi stated she was only pointing this out because it was unclear to her. <br /> Mr. Homeyer stated the working part of the bog, the vines, is exempt because it <br /> is land in agriculture. The drainage ditches cone under the 5,000 s.f, threshold. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the state reqs do not make that clear. He will have to- find <br /> out from the state what they mean because the Commission cannot go beyond what <br /> they mean. He asked Ms Fantoi to her questions in writing so that he might <br /> put it to Town Counsel. <br /> Ms Fantozzi stated in the same section where he does square footage, she thought <br /> the Co ruission might want to give it some leeway and considering percentages of <br /> the agricultural areas; not everyone is going to want or meed 5,000 squame feet, <br /> variation from the state aregs does not make it less restrictive. She is aware <br /> the Comnussion is trying to move forward and be helpful because clue to the bylaw, <br /> work cannot be done that should go forward. If the Conmission deci <br />