4/7/1994 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation ommi s ion A. r April 71 1994 v i Pae 6. a Vim: Motion made and seconded that the Peninsula Council be allowed to go ahead, with supervision by the Agent, working with the contractor, and- that no other work in other areas on the roads where there might be some conflict with a wetland be any greater than that as described Y in this particular location. Ssana Lannik was opposed. Motion carried. It was noted a filing has been received for all the drainage issues. 7:00 B YP RT W M S, Lot 76A Tobi set St. , on t inued from 6 January 1994. CONTINM TO JUM 2.9 1994 - 7:00 p.m. AT TE RFW_UEST of APPUCA , 7:10 TRICO BUJIDERS1 140 Algonquin Ave. , continued from 3 March 1994. Robert Raymond presenting. They have reoriented the dwelling on the property and prop- osed certain protective measures for the bank with a subsequent planting of Myrtle. There is a 52 foot buffer to the wetland. Public. cornments were requested: none. VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close the hearing. HA i`hCLOSED, 7:20 1A UPE II CT, Mashpee Neck Road, Continued from March 1994. Tien Stinson presenting with Al Orlando and- Edward Baker of the District. Mr. Baker stated he was not. here as a Commissioner, but thi Uis in theareawhere berlliVes, it was of interest-to hien. Mr. Sherman stated there were three outstanding issues: Relocation of the main down 'the side to allow for the association drywell; the wetland near Frog Pond Close was not shown; and a determination whether fees were required under the Act. Mr. Orlando advised Mr. Henchy has' provided a latter stating the District is exempt from the town fee but not the State, The plan showing the revised location was reviewed. Mr. Sherman drove the area with Dave Rich-and suggested prior to start of work that he drive it again for erosion control. In a conversation with Atty. Herrchy today, past problem with subcontractors was discussed concerning their not doing an adequate job of maintaining erosion control, or deploying it. � A possible scenario was suggested. The subcontractors put up a bond. and tty. Henchy suggested it might be possible to put In the form of a letter that theo bond would not be refunded until the Conservation Conission is satisfied, Mr. Sherman would like a draft of that letter before any work proceeds. Mr. Stinson advised the South Cape Beach Association has asked that silt fences in their area be removed as the work is completed. Mr. Sherman agreed to* look at the area to determine if this can be done. - = The Chairman asked for the nine of the Clerk' of the works or,plrojec t engineer. Mr. Stinson agreed to provide the name. r IP Public comments were requested: none. 40 } y 4 q / ■ ` ■ i