Laserfiche WebLink
matter. When the concept of architectural plan was first <br /> discussed, that was when there was the danger of increasing <br /> the number of bedrooms and exceeding the 5ppm nitrogen load. <br /> Since this isnft going to haven, he did not think it was <br /> necessary. <br /> Mr. Horeyer asked if the Agent was sabring a lot over 1-1/ <br /> acres does not have to come in with architectural plans? He <br /> felt different rules are being made for different people. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it would depend on the number of bedrooms, <br /> Mr. Green agreed with Mr. Home rer*. If a rule is established <br /> it should apply. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the Commission would have to have <br /> architectural plans for every house, He suggested verifying <br /> with the Board of Assessors the number of bedrooms for a l l of <br /> this and receive an architectural plan for this structure <br /> alone; he asked if that would suffice? <br /> Mir. Buckley agreed to provide them. He asked if the <br /> Commission wanted the addition and the existing house? That <br /> was correct. The addition is to be a study. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday suggested closing pending receipt of plan, <br /> review and approval . <br /> Mr. Desrosiers stated 20 x 20 would not exceed run-off. <br /> Mr. Homeyer would go alone with the Agent reviewing the <br /> plans. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close pending receipt of <br /> plans and the agent's review. <br /> It was noted this is an RISA. <br /> VOTE* Motion amended and seconded for a negative <br /> determination upon receipt of the Attestation of <br /> Ownership and the receipt and review of the plans by <br /> the Agent. Unanimous vote. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br /> 10 STEPHEN R. DUF1EiE for site preparation under chapter <br /> 172 , Mashpee Town Bylaw and Chapter 131 .40, Wetlands <br /> Protection Act) ; and house construction under Chapter~ 172, <br /> ashpee Town bylaw, all, in/or within 100 feet of Land Subject. <br /> to Coastal Storm Flowage at 40 Ieshobe Road. Mr. Dufresne <br /> presenting. <br /> A letter from an abutter, Mr. Schluster, was read into the <br /> record. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday stated aesthetics are not the domain of the <br /> commission. <br /> Mr, Sherman stated only a portion of the lot comes under the <br /> commission's jurisdiction., <br />