Laserfiche WebLink
- - <br /> Mrs. Ferriday stated they were to downgrade the house. <br /> Mr, Sherman stated he has met two tines with Wayne since the <br /> last hearing to re-dc wetland limes and they have agreed. <br /> The hearing was continued to discuss keeping the disturbance <br /> out of the 50 foot buffer. The plan still has numerous areas <br /> less than 50 feet. He checked the old filing; there is a <br /> septic system and it is on the upland. He recommended <br /> denying the plan that is currently under review with less <br /> than 20 feet from the wetland. They could put it on the <br /> upper plateau. The original Order of Conditions is still <br /> do-able; he would have to do some refitting, but it could he <br /> dome on the upper part of the lot. It should not he <br /> permitted on, the lower part. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday stated it is not attractive at the tap of the <br /> hill. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the whole area is a remarkable wildlife <br /> habitat. <br /> Mr, Rosenberg stated it should he denied, the question is <br /> with or without prejudice. They still have to come in with <br /> new plan, in a new location, even if continued. <br /> VOTE: lotion made and seconded to deny without prejudice the <br /> Notice of Intent application for Charles Talanian. <br /> Unanimous Note. <br /> DENIED E ITHOUT PREJTJDICE, <br /> Mr. Tavares arrived at and was advised by the Chairman <br /> that the project was denied without prejudice. <br /> Mr. Tavares asked for a chance to speak. <br /> !r. Sherman stated the hearings are stacked up and it would <br /> not be fair to put other appliants out, <br /> Mr, Tavares asked if he could submit new plans and ask for a <br /> continuance <br /> Mr, Dessies stated, based on a submission of new plans, h <br /> would Grote for continuance to a date certain. <br /> 'OTE: Notion made and seconded to continue to 25 May 1995 at <br /> 7: 40 p.m. <br /> Plan recision date 12 April 1995. <br /> TEDI C, IdM s , 77 Lighthouse Lane, Continued from March <br /> 1 , 1995, <br /> Mr, Sherman stated he was baffled because he talked to him <br /> and to Ns Marsh and yet the plan does not show the house <br /> mored back s agreed. <br /> Mr. Hunter advised they decided they wanted the footprint a <br /> little bigger. He found the configuration of the septic made <br /> it impossi <br />