Laserfiche WebLink
6/22/95 <br /> Page 1 . <br /> Mr . Johansen advised there are issues outstanding , DEP <br /> number , Beard of Appeals , it is on the restriction gaps so a <br /> copy must be mailed to the Wetlands Conservancy , and the fees <br /> are wrong as footage/ it -incorrect; i i 3 feet . <br /> Concerning the problem with the cronans adding n extra <br /> float , this will be conditioned . <br /> Public comments: none . <br /> Rick or k stated this 's another Prime shellfish habitat with <br /> water flowing '.n from the creek . The dock sits on the bottom <br /> at low tide . He would like to see float stops . Ms Frappier <br /> agreed . <br /> VOTE= Lotion made and seconded to close pending receipt o <br /> DEP number , Board of Appeals approval , receipt for <br /> mailing to the Wetlands Conservancy , additional fees , <br /> and condition that float sops be installed and that <br /> he second -float not be appended .. Unanimous Vote . <br /> CLOSE PENDING. <br /> 8:40 TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH FMIL TRUST to amend the Order <br /> of Conditionsfor SE 43-1312 to add flaw diffusers to the <br /> reserve area of an existing septic system at 202 hyo no osooy <br /> Road . John Norman presenting . He advised the Smiths were <br /> concerned with the change in Title V and would like o expand <br /> the septic . They are not having any problems at this time . <br /> They cannot add a bedroom or bathroom with .his system . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated they did not show this in the ACEC when <br /> he did the filing and the proper performance standards wer e <br /> not applied . The order of Conditions was i ve n under the <br /> ss p ion was not in the ACEC . There is no problem with <br /> the septic work but how does the dock situation get handled- <br /> He suggested going on record as having- no problem with the <br /> septic upgrade but Town Counsel should be contacted on the <br /> other issue . The old dock has changed and is different. than <br /> what It was . <br /> Mr . Fitzsimmons stated this is something separate . <br /> Mr . Sherman agreed but stated now is the time to do lot . He <br />' <br /> would to recommend t.o accept he amendment upgrading the <br /> septic subject to a satisfactory conclusion on the matter o <br /> he dock with respect to the ACEC . <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to accept the leamendment to <br /> upgrade the septic subject to a satisfactory conclusion <br /> on the matter o he dock with r expect to the ACEC . <br /> Unanimous Vote . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg pr~oposed issuing no amendment before <br /> I <br /> I <br />