My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/13/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/13/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:23:15 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 1:47:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/13/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
13 . ugly 1995 <br /> Page 14 . <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find a negative <br /> determination . Unanimous Vote . <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br /> OTIS IRP- Mr . Rosenberg erg re iewed the right of entry form . <br /> They have been going onto the property for test wells . The <br /> Selectmen voted it the other night without Town Counsel 's <br /> review . Language will have to be corrected if Elliot thinks <br /> it should be . <br /> Also , the Selectmen should e made aware Permission has to <br /> core from all three . <br /> Mr . Sherman as iced if this would rise to the level of a lease <br /> agreement , i terms of going to town meet and the legislature <br /> and all that? Mr . Rosenberg dad not think so; the necessity <br /> for this work makes it kind d o tricky . Where are two words <br /> in paragraph 1 , reading government , i is representatives , <br /> agents , contractors and assigns" , using the word assigns as a <br /> noun , that could mean anybody 'in the world that they wanted <br /> to give their rights to . The word assigns is too broad <br /> Mr . F osenf er 's other comment ,, for the rest of it he has no <br /> problem , but would point out that the Commission is covered <br /> in that on the second page there is a commitment by the <br /> government , at the end of the 24 months period , to remove a y <br /> thing they put in and restore the property ty to its original <br /> condition . <br /> Where is a clause in section two which relates to the right <br /> of the government to go into other lands of the conservation <br /> commission r o i d l ng access if needed to get into lots around <br /> Moody Pond . Mr . Rosenberg had no knowledge of any other lots <br /> affected by them . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated if that language were to be accepted , it <br /> should be only with prior notice . <br /> Ms Lannik stated they do not need to pint this clause i n . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated if there are no such lands it is a moot <br /> point; if there are such lands , what ,language would be <br /> needed for protection? <br /> Mr . Rosenberg stated 'if there are such lands , there should be <br /> a provision in paragraph two , "with prior notice and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.