My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/7/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
9/7/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:28:04 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 1:52:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/07/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
September 1995 <br /> Page 6 . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated the condition to be withdrawn is not <br /> necessary or legally enforceable . <br /> Mr . Fitzsimmons asked about the other peop eI.n o ed he <br /> Agent stated that cannot be addressed because they , had the <br /> opportunity to be here and chose not to be . <br /> Mr . DiGregorio advised Mr . Reidy only wants one power boat <br /> sing this Pier and this was agreed . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg stated this cannot be conditioned bust Mr ., <br /> Sherman stated the Commission could that and asked if they <br /> would have any objection to a condition of one boat? <br /> Mr . Blythe stated his son will be having a boat there at some <br /> point also . <br /> Mr . Sherman asked the water depth and was told 5 .4; two boats <br /> could be oondltioned , docked stern out . <br /> Mr . Blythe stated it already was conditioned that there be 2 <br /> 4✓ . and 15 f t . boats . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg asked if the application for amendment notifies <br /> these other parties? There is no explanation o what the <br /> a' end en s for . He '.s oonoerned with an amendment wiping <br /> out the rights of two other parties without notice to the two <br /> other parties . <br /> Mr .. iw/i Ger- g*orr i stated they were notified . They came back 'in <br /> in 1992 with the much smaller ao i l l y . Fees were Paid for <br /> the Pier and boardwalk , there is no pier or boardwalk . The <br /> plan before theo isslen is the plan adjudicated . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg stated he may be right but he is concerned <br /> about taking away recorded rights of third parties based on a <br /> notice to them which does not indicate they are being <br /> affected . If the novice had indicated it was affecting them <br /> by removing the condition "shared by two abutting property <br /> o +ners o4 and they did not appear , it would be different . <br /> Mr . Sherman t o ed if they were not i fi eek of this specific <br /> item and they objected , i is not a wetland issue , he <br /> Commission could coo it anyway , even .i they objected . <br /> Mr . esr o�s i er s suggested closing with he receipt of letter <br /> from bath parties . <br /> Mr . Blythe stated the deal was he would build the pier and <br /> the three neighbors would share . The one to the left did <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.