Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> September 1995 <br /> Page; 8 . <br /> permit a revised engineered plan and floor plan for 175 Surf <br /> Drive . The Agent gave the background on the project , the <br /> extensions granted and Amended Order issued . With the change <br /> in Amended Orders in March of 1995 by DEPo the date cannot <br /> extended by amending and no further extensions can be issued . <br /> He suggested Denying without pr Jd i so they you l d file <br /> now Notice of Intent . It was. offered to waive thetown <br /> new denitrifying system will be on the new plan with <br /> additional Plantings . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg agreed it should be denied i hou prejudice . <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded o Deny Without hour. Pr ud o <br /> the request o Amend the order of Conditions -dor <br /> SE 43-669 . <br /> DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE <br /> 8: 10 0H SULLIVAN o permit After-The-Fact selective <br /> clearing d removal of vegetation ; a gravel walkway; and <br /> replanting/landscaping 51 & 47 Redwood Circle . Brook <br /> Monroe r r se i rig with Mrs . Sullivan . n March of this year <br /> n enforcement order was 'issued on Lots 14 & 15; the work was <br /> done on Lot 15 . The Notice of Intent is in response "dor what <br /> was done . The house is on lot 14 . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated they will be doing significant ork . <br /> Ms Monroe stated there are two "s on the lot and they <br /> would like o do some clearing , build walkways and maintain <br /> the garden area . They are proposing shrub species for <br /> wildlife h itat . They are also proposing to seed with <br /> mixturecommonly used i wetland areas for stab' l *zat* <br /> pre-work -si . is required and the property will be <br /> ref lagged pr for to <br /> Mr . Sherman asked i i was their intention o dig areas <br /> . rr�*d the parameters o the paths What would besidethe <br /> shrubs Ms Monroe stated it will be seed mixture . He asked <br /> that this be clarified on the plan . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated there has been removal of vegetation; <br /> selective rr oV l is going to be very difficult . n the <br /> feet shown adjacent ,, they may have to redesign the pathways <br /> .o accomplish them with an aggregate width of 8 feet . This <br /> issue will have to be revisited . <br /> The last issue is that on the current revegetation plan , the <br /> Town has plans or work on the river banks but it is too dry <br />