Laserfiche WebLink
21 September 1995 <br /> Page <br /> VOTE= Motion made and seconded to continue; to 19 October 1995 <br /> at :3 .m . at the request of he applicant . <br /> Unanimous V e <br /> CONTINUED I To 19 OCTOBER 1995. <br /> SUZANNE5H to reopen the 1993 filing for an addition <br /> o a single family dwelling , Septic system upgrade and <br /> improvementand maintenance of an existiong dock 5 <br /> Timberlane Drive . Paul Le I i .o presenting with Bob Raymond <br /> and M r . Nash . <br /> Mr . Lelito advised the order of Conditions was never issued . <br /> Theres one manor revision , the stairway has been flipped to <br /> move i further away ' from the resource . Another orange is <br /> the location of the h yba e line which has been roved up as limit of works as close to the construction footprint as <br /> possible to reduce any disturbance on the embankment . There <br /> are changes in the Notice of Intent check-off . They are not <br /> proposing to do work in the statutory bank area but will be <br /> doing or in land under tater bodies with 2 inch pipes to <br /> stabilize the exalting float . Also , in the Notice is that <br /> single s" beach tree is to be removed in the southeast <br /> corner . There isand 15" tree that will be removed i n <br /> the building oo .prin . The revision date '.s today , <br /> September 21 , 1995 . <br /> Mr . Sherman asked if there is a plan that shows the <br /> difference be een the old structure nd the proposed . He <br /> was told there is . The purple area highlighted is the area <br /> of expansion on the existing structure . <br /> Mr Sherman had asked for that and thanked Mr Le i o . <br /> Concerning the outstanding issues , the number of bedrooms has <br /> been verified; there 's no increase , it is a reduction from <br /> o 4 . He does not feel the pipes for the dock are any <br /> problem . He had discussed 'issues at the time of the on-site <br /> with the engineer and Mr . Nash . <br /> . They are going forward toward the resource area bar 4-5 <br /> feet . If this was a net hoose C- oming to the -commission , they <br /> would have to maintain he 50 foot NVBS . On the new plan the <br /> deck is approximately 31 feet from the resource . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg pointed out it is 27 feet at the north corner . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated there is a lot of literature that has been <br /> developed that a 50 foot buffer is barely adequate . This is <br /> very steep slope and they are encroaching even closer than <br /> before . He suggested at the on-site t hat the Commission <br />