Laserfiche WebLink
16 November 1995 <br /> Page 15 . <br /> along that entire length , vegetate the coastal bank and then , <br /> n phase 2 , nourish the beach back o the x 989 profile . �" <br /> -beach has eroded be ween 32 to roc hes ,, it varloes along the <br /> front . A Chapter 91 permit is required and is presently <br /> . r � CorpsS1 i " cs ' of <br /> Engineers l s needed; a Water QualitY Certification which <br /> order of Conditions will serve- as and they have <br /> modification approval from Cape Cock Commission nd a Wetlands <br /> Restriction AML ! ova l . They also have K w concurrency d an <br /> T <br /> extension from DEP . <br /> Public comments: <br /> Scott We el asked why the properties west of Maushop on " <br /> have beaches today? They have revetments , hard solutions ., <br /> but no beaches . He is personally for the revetment , he <br /> believes it is needed to protect their property , but not at <br /> the expense of the beach . He asked that no action be taken <br /> until Chaptor 91 is approved5 because without hpter 91 when <br /> they build the wall shop will fail in line with Triton <br /> Way , Tide Watch n ridown the road without beach . <br /> Mr .. Shern stated the/ / issn cannot wait for Chapter 91 . <br /> Mary Allen , 723 Maushop Village , asked the Commission to look <br /> again closely . is almost 1000 feet of rook that is being <br /> talked about and there i s a vociferous group that are for <br /> saving the beach and are saying has to be done very <br /> carefully an h a real commitment . She thought they owned <br /> it , they pay the taxes , but whoever needs to be approached , <br /> she hoped that the Commission will please save their beach . <br /> Scott Wentzel advised he spoke with DEP , Chapter , two <br /> weeks ago , and they said he permit should be forthcoming the <br /> first week o December . e questioned he status+ o he <br /> extension . ! ' . Hayes stated has W granted h✓Y DEP . H'i s <br /> recommendation o the trustees will be to go ahead full bore <br /> under whatever ieg i framework they need . He. asked 'if there <br /> was at this point no legal out-off date of JU1Y 1996 . <br /> Mr . Hayes stated there is ,, based on this commission os <br /> approval , unless an extension and amendmentr received <br /> under the bylaw . <br /> Mr . Wentzel stated the application was filed under the <br /> Maushop Condominium Trust , it should have been filed under <br /> Maushop village Trust . 1r- 1. Sherman stated that will be <br /> ascertained legally n e burden 's on Mr . Hayes and the <br /> lawyers to convince the Commission . Mr . Wen zei stated there <br /> were two letters he dropped off a month ago that he wanted to <br /> be sure were made part of the record . <br />