My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/28/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
12/28/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:11:54 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 1:58:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
28 December 1995 <br /> Page 12. <br /> Mary Allen appreciated the statement no rock walls should be built. She thought this <br /> should be looked at every five years. <br /> Scots Wentzell asked if the 10,000 is in conjunction with Chapter 91 and fir, Hayes <br /> advised it was, as well as the federal permit. <br /> i <br /> l r. Shenum asked A& Hayes if there was any problem with the Conn fission conditioning <br /> 10,000 c.y. annum. fir. des stated it is shown on the profile. They do the prof es <br /> every year to determine the amount to be put down. <br /> fir. Shemun stated the intent is to have the ravet ment at the proper angte of repose. <br /> 1r. Hayes stated they will revisit the proles every year to maintain the beach at the 1989 <br /> profile. <br />' Ar. Sherman asked when the last proles were done` It was during the last three weeks. <br /> Anne Monsey advised she was happy with the beach the past year and summer. <br /> Mr. Sherm=asked for a comparison of 1989 versus this year. Ar. Hayes stated there was <br /> a differ=tW of 19" to accretion of " at Clan Shell Road. fir. Sherman asked if it would <br /> be maintained at something less? He read from the performance standards for a bead, the <br /> sane under the bylaw, and asked if it would be acceptable to condition they would supply <br /> annually based on the last survey three weeks ago or 1989, whichever is greater. 1&. <br /> Mayes agreed. <br /> Dave Crispin Mated it is a question of econornics. <br /> Tom Curtin stated three weeks ago was different from this mora; on the 10th it was <br /> horrible and it depends on the day you go down. <br /> Eileen Cum is concerned about what is being recommended, so are the homeowners. <br /> A& Fitzsimmons stated it is an inexact science. <br /> A& Sharpe asked if Mh. Curtin was happy with the beach in 1989` She std she would <br /> have to know which day. <br /> Mr. Shen nan stated the Comnussion will haw to see no change to the volume of the <br /> bead. He asked if the people present had seen the plans proposed for the beach. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.