Laserfiche WebLink
28 December1995 <br /> Page 4. <br /> l&. Green questioned the lines being done in August and no filing until December; there <br /> was no rush. He suggested putting this on hold until they can be verified. <br /> l r. Sherry n asked Ms Trencarnp if she was empowered to accept a continuance unto <br /> prix ` She was not. He stated the only other alternative would be to go out in the next <br /> two weeks, dig holes and verify everydfm& but it will AM miss the herbaceous layer, one of <br /> the three components. The Commission is not bound by sow and they have been altered <br /> by past cranberry operations. He did not feel comfortable locking in a lie and not <br /> knowing what the project is. <br /> 1&. Johansen read from a IEP letter concerning snow conditions and delineations. <br /> Ms Trencamp stated that to develop in this area it would be within the 100 feet and would <br /> not be developable in the buffer zone. Any work in the buffer zone would have to come <br /> back to the Co ussi <br /> ron. All the open area falls within the 100 foot buffer zone and would <br /> come before the Commission if work is proposed. <br /> A& Sher an stated the Connn <br />