My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
02/22/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:14:56 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 2:03:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/22/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> 5 <br /> 22 February 1996 <br /> Page 10. <br /> The stated the Coma ssion would be happy to hear any suggestions from them <br /> at the continued hearing, r before with.the Agent, Ali" to the situation. <br /> 1W, Desrosiers was concerned with the work Emit. He did not see how the house could be <br /> constructed without going at least 8 feet into work Umit. fir, Ferragamo did not see an <br /> need for that. It was noted there is a problem with Board of Health and Zomig Board of <br /> Appeals which would delay any decision by the Comnussion. <br /> T'he Chainnan asked if the should be continued for longer than two weeks as they will be <br /> gaiting for other permits? He asked if they will have answers by then? <br /> 1 Ir. Ferragamo stated he cannot mower for Nr. G rotzke. <br /> Aronson stated Board of Appeals is on the 13th. <br /> Ferragamo asked if he could spend some time with the Agent to see if here is any <br /> possible mitigation for that cantilevered deck idea and come back for the next hearing and <br /> discuss it` The Cludnnan stated approval of the Board of Appeals is not completely <br /> automatic and if the hearing is not until the 13th, there is no point in coning back here <br /> prior to that and receive% conditional approval. <br /> lx. esrsirs felt continued meetings should be cued, as they are squeezing the <br /> agenda- <br /> fir. Ferragamo asked that for hose areas the Commission has jurisdiction over, have <br /> concerns been addressed? <br /> The Chairman asked what would happen if they come in on the 7th and then the Board of <br /> Appeal makes changes on the 13th? fir. Ferragarno stated they would come back on the <br /> 21st. <br /> rlr. I esrosiers stated the Comnussion wants to avoid having hearings continued. <br /> Sherman asked 1W. Ferragamo, would he accept a month, yes or no <br /> I Ir. I esrosiers stated he would not vote for any extensions ager this one on the 7th. <br /> erraganrno stated that is not fair to ars applicant and asked whys? 1W. Desrosiers stated <br /> it is because the C 4 sion is getting backed up, b&. Fouagarno stated they pay fees and <br /> are entitled. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.