My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/21/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/21/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:16:59 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 2:04:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/21/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
21 March 1"6 <br /> page 1 I. <br /> Mr. Grotzko ad =d the epfic is. beyond the 100 feet. The house has been moved <br /> towards the resere lot and the road; It is pushed to the re em by over 3 feet. The septic <br /> has been redesigned efiminaft the reserve area. The deck is 4 feet above the terrain. <br /> .s Allen did a review and recona ended plantp for the area. fs asms ent was that <br /> the plants will not be impacted by the n&iffW deck overhang. <br /> Nk. Green asked if they wiU mvegetate the work area? Mr. Grotzke stated any disturbance <br /> between haybales and the buffer zone will be revege#ated. He and the'Agent can reach an <br /> agreement on this. <br /> A& Shernun questioned the landwape plan and the cirelm Rhown. ?&. GrotAe stated it is <br /> a schematic repmsmtation of the Knit of the exisft tapes. fir, Sherman asked if the <br /> proposed eta prumwng was new? Mr; Grotzke stated It is not proposed here because it was <br /> not In the Notice of Ment. He wiff request an amended order on It later. <br /> Mr. Shennan stated he coidd 110t end vista as part of this fang and also, <br /> for eta pruning.within the 50 foot buffer, it would have to be a separate Notice of Intent. <br /> Mr.- Grotzke <br /> Nft. Grotzke stated the final issue is the number of bedrooms and level of went that <br /> the septic"ein pro ides. As a standard for judgment the dem of a house, if allred <br /> to build two bedrooms on this lot it would be 6.5 ppm. With the Fast system four <br /> bedrooms and the eluent level allowed bar the Board, they would reduce the nitrogen to <br /> 5492.�• <br /> fir# Sherman,did.not recommend aceep ft this. Nir. Grotzke was told earlier that this was <br /> not going to fir. The Commission hw already made a decision that ° is aff#hat is going <br /> to be assumed. lair. Grotzko agreed that was not part of the siAmiiission. fir. Sheer <br /> stated there is that issue and SO the issue of encroaching 1-1/2 feet inside of the buffer <br /> Nr. Green asked if wydft could be done with plandW to improve habitat <br /> Mr. Rosenberg enberg stated 3250 s.f is enormous, even for four bedrooms. 1W. Grotzke <br /> pointed out that ineWdes the garage which oo s.f, Nft. Rosenbag stated it is up to the <br /> limit of lot coverage. <br /> Mr. Grotzke aged it has gone through the Arc1fit=ftW Review Commift=1 Board of <br /> Appeals and Board of Health.. <br /> I ir. esrosiers questioned roof drams. A&. Grotzke stated they will go into gravel paths <br /> around the house. <br /> i <br /> L - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.