Laserfiche WebLink
21 March 1996 <br /> Page 12. <br /> 1W. Ferragamo stated the roof w l go mn scvwal directions but the deck wffl discharge <br /> velocity and it will go to a stone apron undex the deck. Ming can be done under the <br /> deck, water will dfibble down through. <br /> 1W. Grotzke suggested gravel within the fit 3 feet of the foundation. <br /> A& Sherman referred specifically to. the natuWly -vegetated. buffer strip; he d st buted <br /> mimmation. It would be setting a precedent if going into the 50 foot buffer zone, He read <br /> from the bylaw. The demonstration has been made that this portion of the dock is <br /> necessary ani to the applicants <br /> A& I srosiers stated in the past the�Corrm' cion has allowed compensatory pl.arnfiW. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated that was in the.past when the house could not have beerx a owed. <br /> 1W. Rosenberg stated wiffik.the buildable ama they have at least ° coverage. <br /> Shermanp ointed out that they intend to come back in for vista pnmivg In the buffer <br /> zone. He, pointed out the buffer zone has been incorporated into the bylaw at Town <br /> Meefing. Mr. Ferragamo stated the Co ' 'on may require, it does not say the <br /> Conunission requires He firther stated on item 12 in the Notice of Inten4 it is not <br /> w fldn the estimated habitat map. <br /> A&. Grotzke Mated he asked AJIM. the Commission's nsult ext to reNdew the plans <br /> with him for ghat would be..appropriate here and he made reconxmerxdatior ,for items that <br /> rout well under the dock. They be p bluemries that are not them no . <br /> Mr. Green asked, on the access deck to the main deck, what would be the Jamage to <br /> cutfing it down IS inches? l r. Ferragamo geed as long as it meets state access width, <br /> 111Th. Shennm stated ff#hey can make It a 3 foot deck, it would meet the requirements. <br /> ' stated that w1 a the su 'ect <br />� fir. �oserxbe�r questioned the proposed paths 1�Ir. trot b <br /> Of another fift.for the dock which will be ffled within a few weeks. N& Rosenberg was <br /> concerned that it is shown on the plan. Mir. Sh nnan stated it can be canMoned that this <br /> is not part of this MTI& It was Agrc4Dd thM section of the deck win not exceed ". <br /> Feffagatno wanted it made clear that was from the fie of the house to the amide face <br /> Of the rail. <br /> 1 rIx. Dmoaiers uk&d that drainage fim the roof be shown on the plan, an apron. <br /> i <br /> L <br />