Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 21 March 1996 <br /> Page S. <br /> Public comments: none. <br /> VOTE: 1►otion made and seconded to close the hag p ig receipt of DEP number. <br /> CLOSED PENDING. <br /> 18:20 JOHN C. MLL for the reconstruction of 13 feet of gra to block embankanent and <br /> a request for maintenance of an existing wooden bulkhead, stone concrete and granite <br /> embWd nment along Hamb n Pond at 5 Clamshell Way. <br /> r. Sherman advised the HiUs had a peri t which ran out. Work was begun, it is under <br /> control. b&. came in for an extension was assisted with this s refiling. <br /> Pudic comments.- none. <br /> VOTE; Moft(m made and.seconded to clams the hem pence receipt of DEP number. <br /> 30 IDEM Division of Resource Conservation for the phased confmuation of <br /> piously perrnitted roadway paring OvWn Access Roadway) to South Cape Beach Mate <br /> Park Great Oak load. Nornman Mayes presenfing with Greg Taylor and Paul Botelho. <br /> Mr. Taylor advised this is a joint fig with. IDEM; they will FxMdc engineering and <br /> IP <br /> financing and comtruction mwmgement., Mashpee is ad&esdm the en iron nental issues. <br /> hr* Botelho advised as part of the on-going IDEM paving of the South Cape Beach area, <br /> they are proposing the last phase, a 2200 ft. extension from the exisft entrance t <br /> McGregor load facility to the entrance of the town beach roadway to include a 22 ft. wide <br /> paved area surface with 5 ft. buffer on each side and one <br /> Mr. San asked if that is in the area of standing water? lit•. otelho stated it was a <br /> Shan <br /> there is a past.bktory of problems. He gave a fime frwne of fimlementation by the fnt of <br /> June. <br /> Mr. Hayes stated it is A within the W uoit ACEC. xft. Sherman stated they should <br /> y � � <br /> not gloss over the ACEC issue because the performance standard for every resource in the <br /> CEC is`ono adverse effect",, so care should be taken. <br /> W. Hayes sued he and fir. Sherman have walked the road. Where is a 225 foot section <br /> that puddles and does not drain very well for which is proposed a French dry system <br /> which does not change or compromise the DEM plan. A French drain is 24" wide, 3" <br />