Laserfiche WebLink
2 May 1996 <br /> Page 9. <br /> act as a re structure. Thr. owner is asking if the Conmwsion will consider varymg <br /> the required buffer. <br /> h& Sherman stated the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that there is no other <br /> way to do it. <br /> Xft. xrot ke asked if they go to the Board of Appeals and do not get the setback, would <br /> the Commission consider that there were no available options? fir. Sherman stated the <br /> Commission will have to await Board of Appeals action. <br /> A& trot ke stated if what is proposed is not possible, he would suggest not momng <br /> forward. N the Board would be tots y against it if they don't get the variance, he would <br /> recommend the client not consider it a buildable lot. <br /> A& Shenan did not believe compensation is the answer to god into the 50 foot zone; it <br /> is a very steep slope, if not there could be some fle ib .ity. <br /> 1W. Grot ke stated there is no undentory or ground cover; they could plant a dense lover <br /> ground cover. <br /> Ilir. <br /> O'Hara stated he would rather hold the 15 foot setback but would like a o' x 28' <br /> building envelope, the Conmussion would agree. <br /> h&. Rosenberg stated the Comm* Sion world have to see a lot more detailed carne, if there <br /> is going to be any change, especially with the steep slope. <br /> l r. Desrosiers stated even cantilevering is an intrusion which destroys habitat value. <br /> Mr. O'Hara asked if he could design a hone that he can live with, whin these confines? <br /> Public conunent : none. <br /> VOTE; Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 30 May 1996 at the request <br /> of the applicant Unanimous nimous Vote. <br /> CONTINUED TO 30 MAY 1996 AT 8:00 P.XL AT THE REQUEST of THE <br /> 8:30 MARK GORST IN to upgrade landscaping and moth 'ication to a deck and <br /> insta&fion of a hot tub at 127 Tide Run. Abutter notification receipts were provided. <br />