5/16/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Executive Session

Home Browse Search

16 May 1996 Page 3. agreement with the Town or if they came back before him he would have to rule. This is what he rewaled to me himself, I don't understand how this goes. 1SNBRG; I have another question, I think we ought to thk of the question whether or not we ought to find out if there have been any written communications or reports from Perkins or any of the attorneys to the town, whether the Selectmen, Bob whritenour, or to anybody else and we should guest that we want copies of everydfmg that has been done and we want to be copied on everydiing that cones up from now on. LS S RSf In addition to any eon nu i ati n, I think any copies of drawing or any records or materiW, we should get copies. I'll include that in the letter. .UZS MONS: One of the things we have said all along is that as far as we are concerted, a don't caro what they do but the Laues have got to file a Notice of Intent S : No one has suggested otherwise. MZSI ONS: I just want to make that point clear that we are not getting copied on corspondence to be part of the loop in negotiations with the Laues. This is strictly infonnation, it is not going to change our position. I want to make sure everybody understands that. They may say no, it is none of your business. R SIB : we% he isn't our lawyer then. ISSIIS.: He is the insurance company's. SNBG: No, he isn't, he is the attorney, the insurance company is not party to this lawsuit. if A& Perkins is in this lawsuit; he has Med an appearance on behalf of the defendant and the defendants are the people who are named in the lawsuit. So, he is our attorney, this I know. F I'ZS MONS: You are absolutely fight we were named in the damned suit. SBE : well,, he 's not representing us very well. S NBs: 'hat's another question but he is represents he has Ned with the court as being our attorney. SBE : We are going to have to conclude this discussion, I don't know what time the janitors close up here.