5/30/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

30 May 1996 Page 12. NASH: My sense is that if I ask you to close tonight you will be unhappy and deny it. Therefore, I have two separate issues here, you are right, it's apples and oranges and I understand that. I guess I'll go back and I'll bring in Mr. Lelito again with me, someone to try to argue the points of law; I guess that is what you are suggesting here. SHERMAN: The points of law are quite clear, I think he has got to satisfy the Burden of Proof by compelling evidence in terms of wildlife habitat. Read this over and give a copy to Paul, in terms of the values of the 50 foot buffer strip and what it docs. FITZSHVIMONS: Does anyone from the public wish to comment on this application? ROSENBERG: I move that the hearing be continued at the request of the applicant to June 13th at 8:50 p.m. NASH: If that date turns out to be problematical, can I push it up two weeks and call you? SHERMAN: If we did that it would have to be readvertised and renotified. ROSENBERG: Why don't we make it the 27th then. VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing, at the request of the applicant to June 27, 1996 at 7:40 p.m. Unanimous Vote. NASH: Would it be okay to ask the board, between now and then, to individually, or whatever go over to the lot and take a look at the site to see what it looks like? i ROSENBERG: Some members may do that. NASH: Should I do anything to the bank, or anything to anything, between now and then. SHERMAN: Just keep that haybale line intact, as we have discussed. HEARING CONTINUED TO JUNE 27, 1996 AT 7:40 P.M. 8:50 MASHPEE WATER DISTRICT, Noisy Hole Road, continued from 16 May 1996. Lynn Hamblin presenting with Dave Rich. Mr. Sherman stated this was originally occasioned by an Enforcement Order for work done along Noisy Hole Road. In the staging area they were moving material around and putting it within a few feet of a wetland. A revised plan was provided with the wetland lines correctly shown.