My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/17/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/17/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:04:54 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 2:19:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/17/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1.7 October 1996 <br /> Page 3. <br /> 1r. Sherman advised what is in the field did not match what is on the plan. It was agreed <br /> Arlene Wilson and Dare Sanield will meet with the Agent at the site. <br /> �&. Sanicki stated the Codon has not seen the per; there is no construction involved <br /> and there would have to be another delineation if planned. <br /> fir. Sherman stated the owner has been doing cut ting, possibly within the edge of the <br /> 1 Vw. A letter to be sent that there is a wetland on the proper which will be delineated <br /> soon and nothing should be done on the proper in the meantime. <br /> Arlene Wilson gave her resume to the Agent as requested. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continuethe hearing to 31 October 1996 at <br /> 8:50 P.M. Unanimous Vote. <br /> CONTE D To 31 OCTOBER 1996 - 8:50 P.N. <br /> "7:40 STEPHEN BERISK 37 Feel way, continued to 31 October 1996 at 7:30 p.m.at <br /> the request of the applicant. <br /> CON TE14UD To 31 OCTOBER 1996 AT 7:301 .N. <br /> 7:41 ROBERT 14ARCoUX, 14 Pemlane, continued from October 3, 1996. <br /> 1 r, Sherman advised the Commission had instructed him to contact DEP and he spoke <br /> with Dan Gilmore who informed hirn the Conumssion could issue and Amended Order if <br /> they thought it j ti able; they would find that acceptable. if the applicant or appellant dict <br /> not like the decision, they could remand it back to DEQ, Another pure test mint be clone. <br /> The Board of Health can approve this pend approval from DEP and the pert test. <br /> A Wilson had raised comments in another letter re the Ekofin Bioclere not working as <br /> If well when it is not a full time residence. This was discussed with the Co nus ,ion and they <br /> did not take a position. <br /> 114x. Rosenberg asked the position of the Board of Health. He was told they are awaiting a <br /> reprised pere test. 14r. She rman stated as soon DEP is satisfied, the Board of Health will <br /> be. He aged they have, not taken a position on nitrogen loading. DEP is routinely <br /> r <br /> pe mining this utdt. <br /> Mar. Sanicki stated Ms Wilson is routinely assuming this will be season but they are <br /> looking to sell this as a full time residence. By a Mate technicality he is " short but will <br /> rectify this technicality by another pert test which should conclude everydiing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.