Laserfiche WebLink
5 December 1996 <br /> Page 5. <br /> George farcy, abutter, advised he is a state registered engineer. The <br /> drawing provided depicts the Darcy-Lipkin pier inaccurately. It makes the <br /> Locarno float much further away than it will be. Also, there is a dimensional <br /> discrepancy in the footage. This points out the need for engineered drawings. <br /> The float is extremely large in comparison to others in the neighborhood.. He <br /> had been told the boat would be 23 feet, it is now 25 feet. This structure wiR <br /> be now closer to the cord grass that sticks up out of the water. The size of the <br /> float is immense, 224 s,f. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the Commission has a standing policy of not allowing <br /> more than 200 s.f of floats; that will be addressed. <br /> Mr. Darcy stated five years ago 11r. Cohen applied and was denied a float <br /> because of navigational issues. He was allowed to pull up a 7 foot dinghy and <br /> keep his beat out in the river; Now this is larger and the effect of the float on <br /> the grass is a concern. <br /> Mrs. Lipkin stated they told it would have to be a shared dock. She expressed <br /> concern about the safety of bring in boats in that small. area. <br /> Mr. Desrosiers stated the Comraission is only addressing environmental <br /> issues. <br /> Mr. Locarno stated it sounded as it might be appropriate to have an <br /> engineered study done. He tried to have a simplified Chapter 91 ung but he <br /> can see there is a lot of opposition so he will have the engineered plan done. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the bearing to January 23, <br /> 1997 at the request of the applicant. Unanimous Vote. <br /> HEARING CONTINUE To JANUARY 23� 1991 A :30 PoMo <br /> :50 PATRICIA JACKSON, TR, 394 Quinaquisset Ave., continued from 1 <br /> November 1996, Dave Sanicki presenting. Mr. Sanicki stated the structure is <br /> out of the Commission's jurisdiction. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated there is disturbance and alteration within the 100 feet. <br /> Mr. Sanicki stated only a few feet. This was continued because the <br /> condominium association was net notified, the immediate unit owners were. <br /> Public comments: <br />