Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 19 December 1996 <br /> Page 16. <br /> responsibility for identifying who should make this g and that is one of the <br /> things that is frustrating these people that are raising these issues. <br /> W. Sherman stated it makes sense that it is the DPW but to remember that <br /> this assertion by the office of Dain Safety is just their opinion and they have <br /> asserted a number of wrong things too. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated if the Comn3ission hands that out and it puts pressure <br /> on, then at least if someone comes in to say that is wrong and the Commission <br /> has to do it, the Commission can ask what authority is there for that? <br /> W. Sherman disagreed- with saying in a letter that the COMMISSILon IS <br /> mandating that it has to be the DPW. Tar. Rosenberg stated he was saying <br /> that the two letters be seat, this one and the Dara Safety one, and go on and <br /> say with respect to this matter, the Conservation Commission, by statute and <br /> local bylaw, is limited to acting upon receipt proper application by authorized <br /> persons. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked who are the authorized persons? Mr. Rosenberg stated <br /> let the Town decide that. <br /> fir. Shaw stated the DPW has been identified as the responsible agent. The <br /> Labe Committee asked Bob Whritenour to have the Selectmen give therm <br /> pern ssion to volunteer to clean out the flume. Bob Whr <br />