Laserfiche WebLink
19 Apr, Hanks to Fields, asking when we would see Errata sheet and disk of <br /> spreadsheet calculations. <br /> 9 May, Harks to Murray re-hearing agenda and draft regulations, Sandwich hearing <br /> date. <br /> . Other New Business <br /> Jim Hams led a discussion about the Waterways Concession meeting with the <br /> Conservation omission. .After some discussion, it was agreed upon that we would <br /> rule out the conservation parcels as one of the options to use in the lashpee liver <br /> Dredging Project. <br /> Jim Hanks suggested waiting a letter to the selectman stating that we have researched the <br /> dredging plans and have_not yet cone up with a solution to our dredging disposal needs. <br /> Paul Lumsden agreed that this seemed{like a good idea. John Swartzbaugh added that we <br /> might take the two favorable dredging sites and.ask the public for comment to help us <br /> decide which site to use for our dredging needs. After discussion, the commission <br /> decided to write a letter to the selectman summarizing the report sent to us by the Woods <br /> Hole Group, eliminating the Conservation land as possible dredging disposal sites, <br /> leaving the two remaining alternative sites and telling the selectman that we have not <br /> been able to (as of this date) locate a suitable site for disposal of the dredging material. <br /> Paul Lumsden made a notion to adjourn the meeting. Bill Taylor seconded the motion <br /> and all other members voted in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 10-55 p.m. <br /> Respectfully Submitted, <br /> Jennifer Ahearn <br /> Board Secretary <br /> Waterways Comrnission <br />