My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/23/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/23/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2018 5:02:54 PM
Creation date
2/26/2018 1:43:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/23/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
23 January 1997 <br /> Page 2. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find a negative determination. <br /> Unanimous Vote. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION, <br /> 7:25 JAMES BUCHONIS for a Determination of Applicability on the <br /> removal of a failed cesspool and installation of a 1,500 gallon septic tank, <br /> 1000 gallon pump chamber and leaching facility at 762 Cotuit Road. John <br /> Slavi.nsly presenting. He stated this was a disaster waiting to happen, it i <br /> an over .owix g cesspool. 50 feet from I lashpee fond. The new system has <br /> been installed. <br /> Public comments: lone. <br /> VOTE: Motion-made and seconded to find a negative determination. <br /> Unanimous vote. <br /> NEGATIVEDETERMINATION. <br /> 7:30 GARY L CARl o 51 waterline Drive South, continued from 1 <br /> November 1396. John. Slavi.nsy presenting with Mr. Locarno. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked if this is a new plan? It was. He stated it is not the <br /> custom of the Commission to hold the hearing when the plan is not in hand 5 <br /> clays prior to the hearing. 11r. Slavinsl y agreed. He advised he met with <br /> Perry Ehis Thursday, it is a fairly tight area. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the Commission should decide what to hear tonight; it <br /> should not go through a full presentation. <br /> Mr. Slavins y stated Mr. Ellis had no problem with this, if not hoofed to a <br /> ramp, he could permit this. The Shellfish officer also had no problem with <br /> this. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised he had conversations with the Harbormaster about this <br /> and., from a navigation standpoint, he has no problem with this. He is not the <br /> authority on environmental issues and felt the Commission should not take <br /> his ecological comments as gospel. He is not a biologist. dere is nothing in <br /> writing from the ShellfishOfficer; he should evaluate Land Under the Ocean. <br /> Mr. Sherman did not feel the Commission could make a decision tonight based <br /> upon the Harbormaster's comments alone. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.