Laserfiche WebLink
23 January 1997 <br /> Page 5. <br /> Mr. Sherman found that interesting and suggested holding to the 50 feet and <br /> o less only if proved the area is insignificant or there is no alternative, but <br /> maybe this is an alternative. <br /> Public comments: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing at the request o <br /> the applicant to 6 March 1997 at :30 p.m. Unanimous Vote. <br /> TEARING CONTINUED TO 6 MARCH 1997 AT :30 P.M. <br /> :00 ROBERT ROCHE, for the replacement of an existing bulkhead, <br /> approximately 24" high x o' long, with pressure treated timbers and <br /> request for maintenance in perpetuity at 6 Great River Road. lir. Roche <br /> presenting. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated there is a problem with erosion. The house was built in <br /> the `50's. The proposed wall may not be the best solution; there may be other <br /> options such as fiber rolls and gabions. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the project as proposed could be permitted, if that is what <br /> the proponent wants to do. lir. Roche asked to continue in order to explore <br /> alternatives. <br /> Public comments: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion Ornade and seconded to.continue the hearing to 20 February <br /> 1997 at 7:30 p.m. Unanimous nimous vote. <br /> CONTINUED TO 20 FEBRUARY 1997 - :30 PA, <br /> 8:10 KI ISTIE COLLINS for replacement of an existing bulkhead <br /> approximately " high x 50' long of pressure treated timbers and a request <br /> for maintenance in perpetuity at 8 Great River Road. Mr. Riche presenting. <br /> Abutter notification receipts were provided for this hearing and his hearing at <br /> :oo p.m. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the comments are identical but the wall looks newly <br /> constructed. The same situation is occurring which may dovetail with W. <br /> Roche's situation. <br /> Pubhe comments: none. <br />