Laserfiche WebLink
3 April 199+7 <br /> Page 3. <br /> VOTE* Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 17 April at 7:15 <br /> p.m. to provide more information and meet with the Agent to see i <br /> some compensatory plan may he arrived at to make the lot more <br /> compatible for wildlife habitat to better meet requirements for <br /> intrusion into a Bordering Vegetated Wetland. Unanimous Vote. <br /> CONTINUED TO 1.7 APRIL 1997 AT 7:15 P.M. AT THE REQUEST OF <br /> THE AP P L I CANT. <br /> 7:30 ROBERT ERT BOGIE, 6 Great River Road, continued from 23 January <br /> 1997. <br /> Mr. Sherman distributed a letter from CZM; a vertical wall is not a good idea. <br /> He is now getting designs on a true stone revetment. It was suggested to <br /> continue for one month. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked of it would not make sense to have an engineered plan? <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if the plan is properly drawn to scale, identifies resource <br /> ares and shows a slope ratio of less than 1-12 with a-rough textured wall <br /> with bedding stone and meter fabric, it would he acceptable. <br /> Publiccomments: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 15 May 1997 <br /> at 7:30 p.m. at the request of the applicant. <br /> HEARING CON'T'INUED TO 15 MAY 1997 AT 7:30 P,M, AT THE <br /> REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. <br /> 7:40 KRISTIE COLLINS, 8 Great River Road, continued from 23 January <br /> 1997. The same issues apply as the preceding hearing. <br /> Publiccomments: none. <br /> VOTE: Notion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 15 May 1997 <br /> at 7:40 p.m. at the request of the applicant. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED TO 15 MAY 1997 AT 7:40 P.M. AT THE <br /> QUEST OF THE APPLICANT. <br />