Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> i <br /> November 199 <br /> Page 8. <br /> Mr. Desrosiers stated ff it is not a fully engineered plan, at least it would <br /> require the same amount of detail showing water depths, property lines, the <br /> height and whether people can wally under it., to meet all standard. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is not being said, at this time, that an engineered plan <br /> is not required. The Commission agreed. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked if the plan for the dock is different in any form than <br /> what was there before. <br /> W. Sherman stated there has not been a dock there for quite some time. <br /> Mrs. Fulton stated she has a letter from the previous owner, Mrs. Eldridge, <br /> dated. Tune of 1985, stating the dock had been up for 30 years. It was <br /> destroyed by Hurricane Bob. Ron Potter told her she did qualify for Amnesty. <br /> They did not require an engineered.plan. She has tamed. to people in her area <br /> who have put up docks without the engineered plan. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated not through this Commission. Chapter 91 is separate <br /> and apart. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated if the State had this exact application, they would have <br /> no {way of lno -in this dock is gomg over another property. Mrs. Fulton <br /> stated she told them and they stated she would qualify under the Adverse <br /> Possession. Mr. Sherman asked if Nir. Potter told her that? She could not <br /> remember whether it was he or Mr. Leonard, but also two lawyers she had in <br /> Natick. Because the dock had been here for thirty years, they diad not see any <br /> reason why she would not qualify, Jeff Leonard carne down and looped at the <br /> area. <br /> The Chairman asked if the dock is identical to the one destroyed M' Hurricane <br /> fob? 11rs: Fulton stated she used the pictures to get something as far as size <br /> goes. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is irrelevant to the Com scion-s deliberations. Mrs. <br /> Fulton stated these are the pictures that Mrs. Eldridge seat her. Aft. <br /> Sherman stated it has to be treated as a new dock. <br /> Aft. Desrosiers stated the applicant should be encouraged to get everything <br /> that is required to avoid having to ask for another continuance for insufficient <br /> engineering or technical data. <br /> Public comment: <br />