Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> i <br /> 18 December 1997 <br /> P age 3. <br /> grant to go into the 50 foot buffer zone of that wetland to install a parking <br /> area. In this case there was something to gainin that they wiH rehab another <br /> area along the Childs liver with more wildlife habitat value. A plan has <br /> evolved to do some plantings near the river itself and in the upland where <br /> there is an old sandpit There would need to be an easement that this land <br /> would be left alone, in perpetuity. The Notice will have to be revised and the <br /> hearing readvertised with abutters renoti .ed, <br /> Mr. Grotzke shored a plan delineating the 50 foot zone around the wetland. <br /> In order to get access from Route 151 and have sufficient paring, they need <br /> to go into the buffer. The area of intrusion is 10,000 s1 As compensation, <br /> they have come up with a scheme to do mitigation on a different lot and have <br /> an aggressive vegetation plan with indigenous plants. They are focusing on <br /> down by the river.with 63 plants total. This is an area of 64,889 s.f' <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he would have to go out and site the plants. Mr. Grotke <br /> agreed. <br /> The Chairman stated as this is being readvertised, it; will be heard again, <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the Commission should have a copy of the instrument <br /> for the easement before the hewing and it. must be recorded. Nir. Sherman <br /> offered to provide the proper form for the easement. <br /> Pubhe comments: none. <br /> William Laney, an abutter, asked where they plan to put the easement: liar. <br /> tarot ke advised it is a restrictive conservation easement. Mr. Haney asked <br /> what would happen if someone put a house there? Mr. Grotke stated they <br /> cannot, it is within the setback for the river. They are tacking one and one-half <br /> lots. lir. Haney pointed to another area and asked why not use that? <br /> Mr. tarot ke stated he and Mr. Sherman looked at the site and it is disturbed <br /> throughout so they are proposing revegetation up to the Zoo foot setback from <br /> the river. <br /> Mr. Green asked if Mr. Haney abuts this lot: Mr. Haney stated he is involved <br /> in the litigation here. W. tarot ke stated this property is not involved in <br /> litigation. Mr. Haney asked, for 200 feet back, they cannot build in this area? <br /> Mr. Sherman at d they could build in the second loo feet with an alteration <br /> of less than 5000 s.f., if they go through a ung. Mr. Haney asked if they <br />