Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> February 1998 <br /> Page 5. <br /> Your cant necessarily bid a house in a coastal bank but if you do you need to <br /> show that there arenI going to be any impacts here. Here there is -138 foot <br /> coastal bank that goes across lots 126-47 and 126-48. Eight percent of that <br /> coastal hank is impacted by a deck about 80 s.f. All f the area in here, Jehu <br /> Fond, the ACE C which is part of the Wa quoit Bay ACE C, has a 10 foot <br /> boundary which is the flood event, as described in the AC C, it comes up to <br /> Great Oak Road and then becomes 11 ft. where it impacts their lot. What <br /> they are saying to the Commission is, all of this area in here is 10 feet and <br /> what is the difference that makes this 11 and this 1 . He cannot get that <br /> answer and if you read the regs, the ACC line is on 9 feet. This lot, because <br /> they are holding the 11 foot ACE line, shows a lithe coastal bank in which <br /> they are proposing to put a deck for 75 feet. They need to show they are not <br /> going to have any impacts. This coastal bank is governed by a set of <br /> performance standards that say that it should perform as a vertical buffer to <br /> prevent flood and storm impacts, it could be a sediment producer, and it <br /> should be stabilised. Based on the regulations they are held to the sane <br /> performance standards for the small coastal bank as they would be held for <br /> the Maushop Village coastal bank. his is a non-sediment producer, it can't <br /> act as a storm prevention vertical base because (pointing) this is not a coastal <br /> bank, this is not a coastal bank and this isn't coastal bank. He asked how <br /> they meet the performance standard of no significant impact. They are <br /> proposing to take 75 feet of coastal bank, work with the comn ,ssion to provide <br /> wildlife benefits, plantings to provide a greater mix of wildlife diversity that is <br /> not already there to show that they can construct this 75 st of deck on this <br /> small pocket coastal bank, held to very stringent performance standards, and <br /> t the same time show that there isn't going to be significant impact. The <br /> house itself is impacted by Great Oak Road that has twice been move in its <br /> layout so that approximately 807 s.f of the lot is now paved. <br /> Further, they have gone in front of ZBA to get relief from the 30 foot front line <br /> setback to 25 to put in a Fast system. This is a very small house, only <br /> covering 10-14% of the lot. They have pined as far as possible out of the <br /> wetland resource area. They are 42 feet to the edge of the BVW, 40 here, and <br /> the only thing they ,are asking in of the Commission is to approve the small area <br /> in the coastal bank and they will mitigate for that less by bringing m a said <br /> amount of plant materials to diversify the wetland vegetation. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked what lis the closest distance between the deet and the <br /> freshwater wetland edge, the BVW edge? Mr. Hayes stated about 41 feet. <br /> Mr. flayes stated the issue that makes this so unique is the ACEC hn , 1 <br /> feet that goes to 9 and thea up to 10. They do not understand why the <br /> difference and why they are being held to this l l ft. standard. <br />