2/5/1998 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

5 February 1998 Page 8. right up through here pointing to the plan) so that this is where you take the setbacks from. Everything is so tight, that is why the variances are needed. Mr. Fitzsimmons stated it clear to him the houses can be smaller. W. Hayesstated the only area in question that the Commission has a legal position on is the small area of coastal bank. Mr. Sherman reminded him of the issue of the ACE C and enhanced performance standard. of "no adverse effect for the resource areas in the AC C" and also there is the setback under Chapter 172. Mr. Hayes stated this Commission cannot go out and permit 35' setbacks and then deny his clients when they have put forth their best faith effort. if they can do something with this coastal bank issue, maybe it will be possible to go further on. He requested a two week continuance. Mr. Fitzsimmons asked if Board of Appeals is in the interim period? �. Hayes was hoping for this and is meeting with Mrs. Walsh tomorrow. It would apply to a]1 three lots. Mr. Sherman requested a vote from the Commission on whether or not they rant to adopt the recommendations as a position for further consideration of these lots. ?r. Fitzsimmons stated he thought it would be a good guideline but he shed to read it fart and not rush into it. It can be voted on at the next meeting. Public comment: none. VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant to 5 March 1998 at 7:30 p.m. Unanimous Vote. HEARING CONTINUED 'HCl 5 MARCH 1998 AT :30 P,Me 8:05 STONEIMC ELROY, 49 Great Oak Rd., continued from 4 December 1937. Mr. Sherman stated the same 'jurisdictional issues apply. There is no need to reiterate, only to discuss changes. Mr. Hayes stated they are proposing that the deck in the Coastal bank 2" will be pulled out of the Coastal Bank to the ACEC line so it does not impact this lot.