Laserfiche WebLink
19 February 1938 <br /> Page 1 . <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if Mr. tarot ke maintains the Rivers Act does not apply, <br /> his assertions would have to be looked at and a determination made. He felt <br /> new ground should not be broken_and-declare it not Rivers Act. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons stated he is trying to avoid a big discussion of all the points <br /> he has in his memo. Mr. Sherman stated he would like to get rid. of 4 - 5 of <br /> them tonight, quickly. He i.s misinterpreting the law. It is going to have to be <br /> continued anyway. The one point that has some validity is contradicted by <br /> another element in the Rivers Act. Board of Appeals issues. render it moot <br /> under many levels now. He would like to dismiss gree or four elements of <br /> his analysis tonight. It will have to go into the record why he is wrong. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons asked him to handle it expeditiously. He asked if the <br /> Commission should write to Jim Mahala or to write an answer to these points <br /> rather than have Mr. Grotzke argue with the Commission. Mr. Sherman dial � <br /> not think so. Mr. Fitzsimmons asked if when Popponesset Creek was declared <br /> a non-river, did someone wri <br />