Laserfiche WebLink
30 April 1998 <br /> Page 9. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he said is what they told him, they being Bill Hauck and <br /> Elinor Walsh, representing her board, have said that they are going to <br /> assume they apply. They asked then to render an opinion in terns of <br /> impacts; he has done so. He asked, why can't the language be added, instead <br /> of saying it "appears they apply", he could say "if you conclude that they <br /> apply'? Atty. Gildea stated for two reasons. 1. Their right for a hearing <br /> before the Board of Appeals has net occurred. 2. Thur aright, before the <br /> Commission, to challenge the scientific basis for the Commission's opi <br />