Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> July 1998 <br /> Page 5. <br /> gentleman from Yarosh Associates, representing the Donovans, came <br /> forward and stated as the architect he agrees with Chris Costa's plan but <br /> would like to refine exactly where the house will go. In 1993, the house was <br /> approved as it is shown on this board he displayed this for the Consion . <br /> fir. Sherman asked if they were not submitting Chris Costa's plan" The <br /> Architect stated the previously submitted plan was approved with conditions. <br /> fir. Sherman asked if they are suggesting a different house and footprint: <br /> He started that plan does not meet the Commission's standards and Mr. Costa <br /> worked hard to get the plan to conform to Chapter 172. <br /> The Chair asked if the owner has reviewed this plan? <br /> The Architect stated they would like to get back to what they had previously. <br /> Aft. Sherman stated that was not possible. The bylaw, approved by the <br /> Attorney General, stated the burden of proof is on the applicant to prove they <br /> cannot stay out 'the <br /> ' buffer strip. Mr. Costa's plan roves it can be done <br /> y p p p <br /> and he would not recommend any plan that is less than 50'. The Architect <br /> stated he is trying to define if the knit of work includes an area whi <br />