Laserfiche WebLink
17 September 1998 <br /> Page 11. <br /> Mr. Sherman recommended considering Mr. Johansen's motion or to allow <br /> the continuance and charge a fee. <br /> The Chair stated If denied Without Prejudice, he would have to rete and <br /> renotify the abutter. <br /> 1/Ir. Sherman stated the Commission could charge a continuance fee and <br /> make h xn renotify the abutters. It is not a legal , the plan is part of the <br /> package. <br /> Mr. Wirsen stated the precedent should stand mer this case. <br /> Mr. Green asked if Mr. Grotzke has the plans? He stated they are in his <br /> computer. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to deny the application without prejudice <br /> due to incomplete filing. Unanimous Vote. <br /> DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, <br /> 9:30 LEWIS RUBIN to construct an addition to the dwelling at 43 Tide <br /> Run. Nfichael Grotzke presenting. <br /> Mr. Johansen made a motion to deny the application vnthout prejudice for <br /> lack of plans; Ir. green seconded. <br /> S <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated the situation is the same. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated a continuance fee could be charged. He will have to go <br /> out there again. Mr. Grotzke apologized and stated he left the matter in the <br /> wrong hands in his absence. <br /> Mr. Wirsen stated the hearing could be continued, the plans are hero now if <br /> someone cones M. <br /> Public comment.- none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to deny the application without prejudice <br /> for lack of plans. <br /> DENIER WITHOUT PREJUDICE. <br />