Laserfiche WebLink
21 January 1999 <br /> Page 9. <br /> Mr. Green felt it should be held to the K2 bog on the emergency certificate. It <br /> would give the Comr sslon a chance to see it working. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked if they can extrapolate that with reliance? <br /> Mr. Szymoniak stated on the edges it is not suite as deep. They can lean <br /> from it. They have already probed it down 40 - 8 feet. <br /> The Chair asked for the consensus of the Commission and it was <br /> unanimously agreed that work should be limited to the K2 bog. <br /> The Chair opened the Boor to public comment. <br /> 4 <br /> Greg Taylor, DPW Director, distributed a copy of a memorandum with his <br /> comments on S-1 Bog Restoration. He stated he tried not to overlap what <br /> Woodard & Curran said. Mr. Taylor raised ten questions on the project. He <br /> stated it appears -that the Commission is lacking the submission of the <br /> supporting documentation to ensure the project construction wiR not <br /> adversely affect the resource area. He suggested the Order of C Inions <br /> should include the requirements of the construction phase of work. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the hearing should be continued to address the issues <br /> enumerated tonight. Work under the Agricultural Emergency would only <br /> apply to the K-2 bog. Language would have to be revised. <br /> Mr. Szymoniak asked if he found a vehicle that could get on the bog such as <br /> an ATV Geo Probe that has a cone on i , would that be acceptable? The <br /> Commissioners had no problem with that. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to include in the Emergency Certificate <br /> only the K-2 bog, pending input from DEP. Unam nous Note. <br /> Michael D&nor asked if the motion also included permission, if Tom <br /> Synoniak could find a vehicle: It was agreed it was, along as he brought it <br /> to Mr. Sherman for approval to bring it out. He wanted to be sure that was <br /> included. <br /> Kathy Wiley asked for clarification whether the second part on having the <br /> ATV vehicle, was that only for K-8 or only for K-2. It was only for K-6 for the <br /> cone test. She asked if they were looking to do the working platform for K#2 <br /> and the possibility, if the vehicle is available, for doing some cone testing at <br /> K-6. This was correct. <br />