Laserfiche WebLink
21 January 1399 <br /> 'age 4. <br /> Mr.. Sstated this is a follow-up to an earlier RDA for deck work. The <br /> landscapers did not realise it is in the flood zone. They have come in with <br /> plan that is a plus. <br /> Mr. Vetstein stated the work will be done before 15 June. <br /> Public convent: none. <br /> V TE: Motion made and seconded to find negative. Unanimous Vote. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION, <br /> 7:30 JEFFREY MANN to construct a single family dwelling; Title V septic <br /> system; landscape retai*=' g wall; pervious driveway; water service and brick <br /> walkway at 3 Bight Circle. <br /> Mr. Sherman Mated he spoke to john Slavinsky today. The plan as drawn <br /> up he could not recommend. Because of the shape of the house, it is in the 50 <br /> foot buffer. John was to come in to discuss changes. The dock is not art'of <br /> the fang. It has a denitrifying systemproposed. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> r <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearng to 4 February <br /> 1999 with the consent of the applicant or the project will be denied <br /> without prejudice. Unanimous Vote. <br /> H RING CONTINUED FEBRUARY 1999 AT 7:20 P.M. <br /> 7:35 JAMES BERNARD, Great River Roach, continued from 3 December <br /> 1998, Mr. and Mrs. Bernard were present. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised this was continued to allow hien to examine aH the <br /> aspects. There are no standards for Land Subject to Coastal Stora Flowage <br /> so this as permissible under the Wetlands Act. The Bylaw is concerned with <br /> state listed endangered species but the Indy slipper noted is not the one on <br /> Cape Cod. All work is 50 feet from the top of the bank and salt marsh. <br /> `here is no reason to deny. Property issues are not under the Commission's <br /> purview. He recommended approval with one or caveat. They will have <br /> to talk to the DPW concerning a curb cut. <br /> J <br />