Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> April 1999 <br /> Page 5. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find negative. Unanimous Note. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br /> 7:30 DAVID L PO, 65 River Road, continued from 4 March 1999. A <br /> request was received to continue to the next agenda. Natural Herita e has <br /> asked for an analysis on the lamprey eel. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 22 April 1999 <br /> at 7:55 p.m. at the request of the applicant. Unanimous vote. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED, <br /> at <br /> t - <br /> 7:35 JOHN C. HESS ER to demolish an existing dwelling, porch and shed <br /> and to construct a single family dwelling with deck, covered porch, shed, <br /> swimming pool, Title v septic system and utility services at 84 Punkhorn <br /> Point Road. Dave Sanicki presented abutter notification receipts. They will <br /> provide a Soo gallon dry ell for the pool. There will be a minimum o' <br /> naturally vegetated buffer strip. A gazebo is proposed. It is a five bedroom <br /> house on a 78,400 .f. lot. with a denitrifying system. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is well within standards. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the flood zone goes through the pool. Mr. Sherman <br /> stated the naturally vegetated buffer is now old lawn. He and Diane have <br /> been out there and agree a buffer strip of that type is valuable as something <br /> other than a lawn. He recommended closing pending some sort of agreement <br /> of what that would entail, either to do plantings or to let it grow back into a <br /> w <br /> grassy sand-plain type habitat. <br /> 1r. Sanicki spoke with his client prier to this hearing and Mrs. Kessler <br /> indicated prior to them purchasing the property they had a discussion with <br /> Mr. Sherman and he lent to that type of consideration. She has no objection <br /> to the recommendations of what should be planted. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he would like to have that list presented to Mrs. Kessler <br /> and have a letter of agreement. He stated the siltation work limit off the <br /> porch, it is 30' on one corner, he asked if it can be squared off? Mr. Sanicki <br /> stated they need room for construction equipment off the house for the <br /> demolition. Mr. Green stated that is practical. <br />