Laserfiche WebLink
4 November 1999 <br /> 'age 3. <br /> Mr. Green stated the path is 40' dropping 15'; there will be channelization. It <br /> is 3-1. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested going 4' and terracing with ties. They could come <br /> back with a design for a walk-over structure. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked the purpose of a path to salt marsh? Mr. Harvey <br /> advised the developer wants to give the most desirable view to the buyer. <br /> Mr. Sherman recommended approval of the vista pruning but not the path. <br /> Mr. W rsen stated there is no pian for erosion. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg expressed concern with the path to the salt marsh. Mr. <br /> Sherman stated the purpose is outside of the Commission's domain. <br /> Mr. Harvey asked for a continuance. <br /> Pubhe comment: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion ion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 18 November <br /> 1399 at :05 p. . Unanimous Vote. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED. <br /> 7:20 MARJORY W. SOUTHWICK, 29 l lonahansett Rd., continued from. <br /> October 1999. John Slavinsky presenting. They have hired a botanist. Mr. <br /> Slavinsky agreed to meet at the site with the botanist and Mr. Sherman <br /> f VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 16 December <br /> 1999 at 7:35 p.m. Unanimous Vote. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED. <br /> 7:25 MICHAEL ANGI RI, 69 Horseshoe Bend Way, continued from <br /> October 1999. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised, he met with John Slavinsky out there to look at the <br /> wetland line and in-land bank issue. There is none there. Revised plans were <br /> reviewed. The buffer is lamer. There is RVW. It is 58 feet to the work limit. <br /> Where is no charge in plan for the house or septic. Mr. Sherman stated it is <br /> acceptable. <br />